dan 'DS Board' Moderator Award for exceptional contribution member is online
Joined: May 2007 Posts: 8,977 Karma: 122
CK & Source A « Thread Started on Mar 12, 2009, 9:32pm »
CK called while I was having lunch with my friend Sam.
In connection with RUs new and continuing series on the Core Story, Steve Broadbent asked CK to verify the official status of Source A.
CK told me that he cannot do that. Today he is questioning that Source A is the same person as the Naval Officer (Captain?) who met with Bruce Maccabee.
I told him that I would mention here his uncertainty about whether the two persons were, indeed, the same person.
I warned CK that his questioning of the identity would likely create a considerable disturbance here. He then questioned whether I should mention it. I said it would be negligent for me not to do so. So he relented. I think he also realized that I would not relent.
If there is a continuing concern about this matter, then we may wish to transfer this topic back to the UN section.
dan 'DS Board' Moderator Award for exceptional contribution member is online
Joined: May 2007 Posts: 8,977 Karma: 122
Re: CK & Source A « Reply #1 on Mar 12, 2009, 9:46pm »
IMHO .
CK has ulterior motives to further involve himself in the affairs of Source A.
We might hope that, as now a possible appointed Intelligence official in the new Administration, he might have better things to do!
We may surmise either
1.) His new job, as of 10/08, was not a promotion or 'political' appointment, or
2.) The BPWH Disclosure scenario is on track
Allow me to make a prediction based on hypothesis #2. ..
CK is doing a retroactive Doty on Source A.
By that I mean CK will retroactively have Source 'A' removed from the official 'picture', i.e. the Navy will, very late in the game, attempt to distance itself from any and all (dis-) information conveyed by Source A to OM/Pickerings.
What will be the net effect? The net effect will be to greatly stir this Pot, beyond what would have been the case had Source A simply remained on an extended Sabbatical.
That is, in fact, CKs ulterior motive in calling me today.
Does this sound too convoluted?
It is certainly not too convoluted, if we are actually involved, right here at OM, in a matter of national and global security.
The MS, Objective of OMF is; To provide International News, Research, Intelligence, Media and Discussion Resources to the world public via the Internet, specializing in Ufology, Disclosure, Exopolitics and Paranormal studies, achieved through news gathering, investigation, networking, and open forum public discussion.
epo3 Global Moderator Award for Services to Silent Wisdom. member is offline
aka: Joe Six Pack
Joined: Mar 2006 Gender: Male Posts: 1,549 Location: Up-state NY Karma: 112
Re: CK & Source A « Reply #6 on Mar 13, 2009, 1:16am »
The MS, Objective of OMF is; To provide International News, Research, Intelligence, Media and Discussion Resources to the world public via the Internet, specializing in Ufology, Disclosure, Exopolitics and Paranormal studies, achieved through news gathering, investigation, networking, and open forum public discussion.
etherian Award for exceptional contribution member is offline
Tall and White
Joined: Jul 2007 Gender: Male Posts: 3,761 Karma: 87
Re: CK & Source A « Reply #7 on Mar 13, 2009, 1:24am »
dan 'DS Board' Moderator Award for exceptional contribution member is online
Joined: May 2007 Posts: 8,977 Karma: 122
Re: CK & Source A « Reply #12 on Mar 13, 2009, 5:14am »
Mur,
You're right about the X-con meeting. A bit strange! But that still doesn't speak to CK's question about that person being the same person as Source 'A'.
All that the Pickerings have to do is state precisely when and how they compared A's identity with Bruce.
Also, who arranged or suggested the meeting with Bruce? And when exactly did it take place? Just to be helpful.
Quote:
What [does CK] expect them to say? Whoops?
Yes, really!!
Thats why we have to wonder what this rehashing is really about.
Perhaps they (Pickerings) have a legitimate concern that CK will go after As pension, or something. Or that Steve Broadbent would.
But it is a bit late now to start worrying about such details(!), or to run for cover, wouldnt one think?!
Can they not understand that all of this Show would have been plotted out, from Day One?!
My God, this may be amateur hour on our end of it ..BUT not on their (USG/Navy) end!
But that still doesn't speak to CK's question about that person being the same person as Source 'A'.
All that the Pickerings have to do is state precisely when and how they compared A's identity with Bruce.
Also, who arranged or suggested the meeting with Bruce? And when exactly did it take place? Just to be helpful.
.
amature hour on your end maybe, lol, the Pickerings are being pretty darn professional.
So CK wants to know precise details about when Bruce met with him, etc, eh?
Why?
So you can hunt down the event on some video camera more easily?
I'd be leary about passing such information to you Dan. Especially when the three letter acronyms are notorious for being the hands behind intimidations, ruinations, and funerals. Add to that two obviously HUGE egos...well, I wouldn't go there...but who knows what Temporal will choose to do.
Should be interesting to see how relevant CK is considered right now to this particular group of pro-disclosures, his demands at least, while Source is under a gag order. Aparently he (CK) hasn't been in the loop todate, judging by the questions? Or maybe he is irreverant to legalities like gag orders. If he is irreverent to such legalities, what other legalities is he and his posse irreverent to? And for what reason?
The time of choice is here; in this moment that choice matters most. What does humanity choose to be?
Jake Reason Member of Distinction Member of Valued Recognition. Award for exceptional contribution. - Admin Emeritus member is offline
You must dive in to see it all
Joined: Feb 2006 Gender: Male Posts: 10,007 Location: Canada Karma: 134
Re: CK & Source A « Reply #14 on Mar 13, 2009, 1:39pm »
CK apparently sometimes forgets what he says . . .
In spring 2007 CK called Ivo (ivo5000 - a Co-Admin of this forum) and answered a number of planned questions, of which CK knew that the questions and answers would be posted on this forum. After the call, Ivo in his diligence to remember all aspects of the conversation immediately called and told me about the call. He later posted the particulars on the forum, here.
CK then denied he'd given such answers, in an email exchange amoung a number of Ufological VIP's. He suggested that Ivo was mistaken and laking in accurate recall. So effective was CK in his about-face, that Dr. Jack Sarfatti refused to believe that Ivo was telling the truth. And vehemently ridiculed Ivo for spreading false information.
Many emails flew around over this.
Eventually CoR25 (CK's acquaintance of 25 years) weighed in and supported his belief that the items told to Ivo are true as far as CF knows them to be true.
Disgruntled Dr Jack Sarfatti eventually believed that Ivo was revealing some truth of CK's position on certain issues, as reported. But none-the-less, the die was cast to shroud the episode with doubt.
OMF Books and DVD's - CLICK HERE
![[Home]](http://s1.images.proboards.com/menu/home.gif)
![[Help]](http://s1.images.proboards.com/menu/help.gif)
![[Search]](http://s1.images.proboards.com/menu/search.gif)
![[Login]](http://s1.images.proboards.com/menu/login.gif)
![[Register]](http://s1.images.proboards.com/menu/register.gif)
![[Search This Thread]](http://s1.images.proboards.com/search2.gif)
![[Send Topic To Friend]](http://s1.images.proboards.com/buttons/sendtopic.gif)
![[Print]](http://s1.images.proboards.com/buttons/print.gif)
Author
![[homepage]](http://s1.images.proboards.com/buttons/www_sm.gif)
Logged
![[avatar]](http://i192.photobucket.com/albums/z268/humanoider/AvatarNine.jpg){kind=avatar}
![[avatar]](http://www.avians.net/lanakila/eagles/bald13.jpg)
![[avatar]](http://i265.photobucket.com/albums/ii218/murnut/surfround.jpg)
![[avatar]](http://i285.photobucket.com/albums/ll72/Cyrellys/Artistic-Other-25061.jpg)
![[avatar]](http://i24.tinypic.com/qn1i5j.jpg)
