Topic: When ET lands: Scott Jones' Plan C (Read 3,001 times)
garuda Co-Administrator Award for Phenomenal Creativity and Insight. Medal of Initiative Award member is offline
Joined: Dec 2006 Gender: Male Posts: 3,264 Karma: 134
When ET lands: Scott Jones' Plan C « Thread Started on May 31, 2008, 7:12am »
What if ET knocks on our door tomorrow? What do we do? How do we present ourselves?
No official plan of action seems to exist to answer these questions, which is why Scott Jones launched his initiative, called Plan C.
He is looking for volunteers to help him: country managers, think tank members, etc. And the plan is still very much open to suggestions. So here's a chance to get involved.
Disclaimer: the views below are Scott Jones', not mine and do not necessarily represent to views of myself, the forum or its administrators. I am putting this up to get the discussion rolling.
PLAN C
Plan C is an integral component of P.E.A.C.E. Inc’s global peace work. ( www.peaceroom.com ) It is a proactive project in support of the anticipated disclosure of Earth’s historic relationships with a host of cosmic cultures.
The following discussion of Plan C has been extracted from a paper presented on June 11, 2006, at the Extraterrestrial Civilization and World Peace Conference, King Kamehameha’s Kona Beach Hotel, Kona, Big Island, Hawaii. The Exopolitics Institute sponsored this conference: www.ExopoliticsInstitute.org . It was updated in April 2008, and presented at the forth annual X-Conference held at the Hilton Gaithersburg Hotel (Maryland), April 17-20, 2008, and at the National Press Club Press Conference, April 21. The host of the X-Conference is the Paradigm Research Group (www.paradigmresearchgroup.org). The Plan C edition presented below introduces a new Plan C project: Earth Disclosure.
History of Plan C
This plan is a greatly revised permutation of Plan B, a plan that was discussed but never used in the Rockefeller initiative with the Clinton administration. Plan B was brought up by Mr. Rockefeller during our first meeting with Jack Gibbons (April 14, 1993) when he said that he knew nothing about UFO/ET phenomena and certainly nothing about any government policy concerning it. This was a stunning statement. It could have meant that a decision had been made to stonewall any discussion of the subject. Mr. Rockefeller responded with controlled anger when he said, "I have considered taking out full page ads in all of the countries’ major newspapers to build public support to pressure the government on this issue." Gibbons was shaken and quickly said that would not be necessary, that he would be glad to work with us. I was really confused by what Gibbons had said. I had known him for seven years and had told Mr. Rockefeller that he was a very intelligent person with cultivated diplomatic skills. The rest of the meeting went more smoothly, and when it was over, Gibbons asked me for the help that I had previously offered.
The mystery of what happened was solved by mid-afternoon that day when I got a call from Ron Pandolfi, the CIA’s Weird Desk Officer. Ron asked me how the afternoon meeting with Gibbons had gone. I told him that there was no afternoon meeting. After a short silence he asked if the meeting had been cancelled. I told him, no, that it had been rescheduled and held early that morning. There was a longer silence, and then he asked again, "How did it go?" I said that it was an embarrassment to Gibbons because no one had supported him for the meeting. He said, Oh my God, we sent the briefing over this morning. We didn’t know that the meeting time had been changed. Since this was not a CIA program, and a potentially political bombshell, they really didn’t want to get involved with it. But when Gibbons asked them for a briefing they had to respond.
What they did was inept, and reflected the Agency’s attitude toward the Clinton administration. Twenty-four hours before the scheduled meeting, Pandolfi called Bruce Maccabee and asked him to prepare a briefing. To his great credit, Maccabee worked all night and delivered a briefing to the CIA the next morning that summarized the best U.S. sightings. He had been given no guidance, but realized the importance of the meeting and decided that the best thing he could do was to provide Gibbons with information about responsible witnesses reporting extraordinary events.
When we departed the morning meeting and were walking out of the Old Executive Office Building, Mr. Rockefeller turned to me and asked, "That was the very intelligent and diplomatic savvy guy you told me about?" When I told Mr. Rockefeller later what had happened, we both lowered our expectations of Clinton being able to do what we had hoped to accomplish. Not only was Clinton kept in the dark about any UFO/ET programs; he had no knowledge about policies regarding them.
Plan C
Reality: It is most likely that billions of the earth’s population have no knowledge of exopolitics. This is not a matter of lack of interest in the subject, but sadly and simply because they must devote all their physical and intellectual energy just to survive. That will begin to change for them, and for the rest of the earth’s population when disclosure takes place whether by skillfully implemented strategies, or by accident, or by blundering incautious bureaucracies.
A very large number of people in many countries are familiar with the evidence that supports the premise of Plan C: the simple and profound fact is that we have been known, monitored, approached, contacted, investigated, examined, studied, and taught since the dawn of humanity by a variety of alien species. Our preference is to refer to these space and time travelers as the Visiting Others.
Plan C is not an intellectual exercise just to gain and exchange knowledge and opinions. Too many institutions for too long have deliberately or innocently failed to honor our natural role in the universe. Recognized and honored or not, we have always been influenced and challenged by this larger reality. We will engage the world’s population, and give them a voice in exopolitics
The agenda of Plan C is to solicit and assemble the best-informed and enlightened minds of the entire world to contribute skill and knowledge as to how to present us as a species in our best interests and intelligent interaction with Visiting Others of widely varying types. This is an action plan that is overdue. There is no designed role for governments and the United Nations to play. Some governments need serious help to get out of the hole they have dug on disclosure.
Phase One will establish the foundation of Plan C. This will be a body of intellectual material from individuals, universities and global think tanks that address, from the region and cultures that they serve, a series of questions based upon the following assumptions:
The consequences of cosmic cultures meeting will be profound in the extreme. Every segment of civilization will be affected. Religion, politics, science, technology, health, agriculture, education, the complete spectrum of life will be challenged by undeniable knowledge of a larger reality.
The only thing larger than the challenge will be the opportunities for Earth and all its creatures.
Contemplation of what the impact will be in various cultures, and the likely responses from those cultures is a worthy project for the best minds willing to undertake that challenge.
The academic community has largely ignored this subject. There has been no unclassified government grant money to attract researchers. This has made the subject suspect at best, and a possible third-rail to avoid. The result of this is that the best minds in most countries have not been engaged on the most important and complex issue that can be imagined. That is becoming a dangerous situation.
There is, however, an established discipline of exopolitics, and global groups and individuals actively working in it. This community has been covering all the classical academic disciplines, and working through and around the embargo on truth about exopolitics, an open source truth-base foundation is being built.
There will be three different timing situations considered in Phase One. The first situation is Future Impact. This is the current world situation. There has been no officially announced or recognized contact. Whether or not such contact has taken place, and for any reason withheld from public knowledge, is not an a priori issue to be addressed. The second situation is First Impact. This will be when disclosure has either been officially announced or that the evidence is so obvious and abundant that contact is recognized without official announcement. The third situation is Post Disclosure/Contact Impact. This covers one year after disclosure/contact and beyond
For all situations of Phase One, the following assumption is made:
The meetings take place under conditions of comity and mutual respect.
Questions and issues to be addressed include:
What will be the impact of these meetings on the culture(s) of your primary concern?
What segments of your culture(s) of concern will be most affected?
How will this impact differ from the impact on other cultures?
How will your culture(s) of concern respond to the consequences of these meetings?
Has your culture(s) of concern anticipated such meetings?
On a global basis, how should the response be orchestrated?
The matter of primitive and highly evolved cosmic cultures arises. To be answered, where is Earth in this continuum?
garuda Co-Administrator Award for Phenomenal Creativity and Insight. Medal of Initiative Award member is offline
Joined: Dec 2006 Gender: Male Posts: 3,264 Karma: 134
Re: When ET lands: Scott Jones' Plan C « Reply #1 on May 31, 2008, 7:13am »
Phase Two, the material of Phase One will be collected, compiled, translated and disseminated broadly around the world in multiple languages.
Phase Three will involve international polling to measure public response to the disseminated material of Phase Two. Polling will largely be via the Internet, with sample polling in areas not adequately covered by the World Wide Web. From this phase a People’s Manifesto of Expectations will be prepared. It will be presented to the President of the United States, all other Heads of States, and others.
Phase Four will involve requesting written responses from Heads of States, opposition party leaders, legislators, jurists, religious leaders, academic leaders, the CEOs of the thousand top corporations, and senior retired military and intelligence personnel, about the material of Phase One, and the public response of Phase Three.
Phase Five will be a final report of findings, assessments and comments of Plan C.
Phase Six will be determined by the Visiting Others.
The period of performance for phases one through six is estimated to be two years. This is probably an optimistic figure.
Plan C Organization
A non-profit foundation, chartered in the U.S., will be established to raise funds required to implement Plan C and to administer its operation. The foundation will be a virtual reality, entirely web-based. This will minimize the cost of operation and essentially open the program for easy monitoring by concerned intelligence organizations. It will prove that Plan C is doing exactly what it was designed to do.
An international board of directors composed of thirteen women and men with experience in fields of science, religion, education, medicine, military, business, media, entertainment, and intelligence, will be selected by lots from recommendations made by professional organizations of these fields. The Board of Directors will name the foundation, assist in fund raising, and approve the implementation plan of each phase.
Funding considerations. The intention of Plan C is to be of service to humanity. All participants in all phases will be asked and expected to contribute at least some of their labor as a gift to this end. Funds will be raised to cover essential travel, communication, printing, and other basic expenses associated with research and dissemination of knowledge.
While we hope that there will be a willingness to donate skill and services, the service motive may not be adequate to garner the support me need.
The estimated cost to implement Plan C is five million dollars. This will have to be raised.
The Foundation staff will be salaried and composed of a Director, Associate Director and ten staff personnel. They will be citizens of twelve different countries. The Director and Associate Director will shift positions at the completion of Phase Two.
Country Managers
We are seeking native country managers to oversee the implementation of Plan C in each of the targeted countries. The manager could be an individual, an organization with knowledge of the field or a university ready to learn and serve in this undertaking. The manager must be respected within the country. Experience in peace and justice work and conflict resolution would be a desirable bonus.
Comments and Observations
The following paragraphs are backgrounders. Some of these ideas, or permutations of them, will make their way into the formal Plan C.
The design of Plan C remains open. We are considering the following:
Option 1. The group of independent global Think Tanks will be the best we can identify that are willing to do the work, and what our budget will handle. We will first ask them to do the work pro bono, pointing out that this is such a civilization-changing event, that the honor of being selected to serve humanity by providing a knowledge base critical to preparatory public education, and for prudent policy decisions by leaders at every level of society is more than adequate compensation. If the best don’t accept this "offer," we will pay for their services. (See Option 2) We hope to recruit think tanks that have a reputation for future thinking to achieve a much more generous and equitable status quo on a healthy, safe, peaceful and loving planet.
We will attempt to recruit Think Tanks in the following countries: United States, United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Russia, Canada (you are right, the G8), China, India, Turkey, South Korea, South Africa, Israel, Norway, Singapore, Australia, Brazil, Egypt, Mexico, Qatar. A less ambitious list would be: the United States, Russia, Brazil, Mexico, South Africa, France, the United Kingdom, Japan, and India.
The other aspect of the pro bono approach is to avoid the charge that the White Papers are commissioned research, supporting and reflecting the biases of the funders. Of course, some Think Tanks may offer to do the work pro bono to assure that their bias is represented.
Colleges and Universities
In addition to the above group, a number of colleges and universities, particularly those with peace studies and conflict resolution programs, will be invited to participate. It is highly unlikely that there would be many, if any, takers from this group unless the rumored February 2008 UN meeting was real and publicly confirmed or so positively rumored that there would be a large intellectual urge to get into the game. Other ideas on recruiting colleges and universities are below. No funding would be offered to these schools.
Option 2. Independent Think Tanks from the countries identified above would be hired to write the "Impact and Consequences" white papers. Each would be offered $100,000 for this task. The money would come from carefully vetted private foundations and individuals that have a reputation of future thinking to achieve a much more generous and equitable status quo on a healthy, safe, peaceful and loving planet.
As in Option 1, the same group of colleges and universities would be invited to participate. However, they would not be offered funding for their efforts. This is simply a matter of budget size to accomplish Plan C. Even if unlimited funds were available, a flat rate would be impossible to determine, and there is no will to negotiate with a hundred or more college and university bureaucracies.
We will make the argument that this is a fundamental service that colleges and universities owe to society.
Comments on Colleges and Universities
The premise of Plan C will be a huge shock to academe. This is the obvious consequence of the successful disinformation program in the United States, and for the most part, the willingness of other countries to go along with it. How do we rapidly and effectively bring them up to speed so that those who want to participate feel confident that their effort will be worthwhile? The mind set in academe is that what is real is currently covered in their curriculum.
Maybe the shock of being asked to participate in this plan will finally get the attention of some schools, and they will seriously consider the premise of Plan C. and enter into a dialogue without snicker overtones.
However, we must not underestimate the power of a cover up that has been on for so long and has been so successful, that many accept the cover up as truth. Additionally, at both conscious and subconscious levels there is fear of what we may discover behind the stars. What will be obvious to all, and very sobering, is that when disclosure takes place - everything changes.
We will point out the real global events that may have not caught their attention. Countries such as Mexico, France, Brazil, Belgium and others have recognized the challenges and opportunities that exopolitics presents. We can point out the predicament that the U.S. government is in. Reversing a policy of sixty years of deceit and additionally trying to finesse the necessary disclosure process is as difficult as it is necessary to do for the future of the species. There can be no turning back, and the best of universities will see significant future payoff to come aboard at this time and make a contribution.
We will ask the Exopolitics Community to prepare an erudite, unemotional think piece that sets the scene for the need to anticipate disclosure. This will be provided to participating colleges and universities, and think tanks.
We can assume that there is already a government plan to inform the public what they need to know for the events ahead. We plan to engage the colleges and universities before the government makes its statement. If our timing is right, colleges and universities will be in a position to comment on what the government delivers to the public.
We certainly hope, and fully expect that the tone and quality of material that the government provides in the opening round of disclosure will be much better than what the Air Force has come up with to explain Roswell and otherwise to disinform. We expect it to be very sophisticated and delivered in a full court press, and that academe will be a very specific target group. The material we deliver to support Plan C must be clever enough to accommodate what the government delivers.
Anticipating the Government’s Disclosure Strategy
We expect the message to be cast in terms of hope and opportunity, and that would be a sincere expression. It most certainly will be the desired outcome from the arbiters of the status quo. Some of us will be working for a far more generous and equitable status quo, but none of us will be able to predict with confidence the immediate, short term and long term consequences of disclosure.
Throughout history, aboriginal cultures have gone through something as traumatic as what disclosure will mean to us. Very few of these cultures survived, principally because there was no interest in their survival. This, of course, raises the issue of intent. What are the intentions of the Visiting Others, and what are the intentions of our government in this drama?
We don’t know these answers, but it is necessary to make some assumptions in order to develop strategies to survive and to take advantage of every opportunity.
The first questions concerns timing: why disclosure now? Has the second generation of Terrestrial Controllers lost their nerve, grown senile, got religion? Is there serious concern that the terrorists’ war threat may spin out of control, and must be trumped by a larger potential threat? There is no inconsistency in presenting disclosure in terms of hope and opportunity with future intent to label it as a threat. This is a well-established strategy. There are, however, some very practical considerations. The first is the establishment of the World Wide Web and the Internet. Inexpensive, near instant global communications available to the public has made keeping secrets much more difficult. The ubiquity of the cell phone with its ready camera has overwhelmed the counterintelligence community’s ability to control dissimulation of photographs that evidence the reality of the Visiting Others. It is also very significant that some TV media has freed itself from the truth boycott. The eight years of the Bush administration have caused a lost of respect for the United States as the chief global Controller. Other countries are more ready for disclosure, and have taken obvious steps in this direction. Another significant development has been the ability of other countries beside the United States and Russia to survey the backside of the moon, and not be dependent on the U.S. and Russia to share discoveries made there. .
This discussion has taken a dark turn from the opening paragraph of this section, i.e., from hope and opportunity to a fear and threat. However, the past sixty year history of the ET/UFO enigma has been bizarre. It is a rich mixture of real and induced fear, lies, disinformation, hope, wild and reasoned speculation. It should not be a surprise that when the truth starts to come out, that hopes and fears are both validated, and that the situation has been much more complex than even the most fertile minds imagined.
It is significant that we can discuss exopolitics with knowledge that Earth and its global population has never been attacked by the Visiting Others. There are, however, intriguing references in Vedic literature such as the Rg Veda, the Mahabharata, the Arthasastra of Kautilya and others that are either the earliest known science fiction, or accounts of conflict between beings with weapons of mass destruction. A most provoking comment about ancient flying "chariots," as they are frequently referred to, is that they were as fast as thought itself. That certainly would overcome any Einsteinian issue of travel beyond the speed of light. It is the height of intellectual arrogance to discount oral histories, to think of all ancient cultures as technological voids, to depreciate the most ancient literature as irrelevant to our future, and most importantly to fail to fully absorb the knowledge stored in Sumerian clay tablets.
Maybe we have not been attacked because, except for the beauty of Earth, there is really nothing here that they don’t already have, or by basic nano technology can create. It could be that their interest in us is based upon our extraordinary violent and covetous attributes. That may be rare in their circle of friends. But then, maybe they want to send a message that our violence and other irrational behavior are costing us more than we realize. Knowledge from cultures that have survived its adolescence will only be shared with those who demonstrate that they are ready for adulthood.
A simple White Hat/Black Hat dichotomy has merit. As much as we think we know and can prudently speculate about, there is much more that we do not know.
It should not alarm a potential friend if we maintain a prudent defense posture. It simply acknowledges an accepted fact. The universe is home to many species, some of which have demonstrated a capability to visit us. If any of these intend to treat us as we treat each other, we will need a defense.
Here are a few theories on timing of disclosure that are offered without arguing any of them:
- Some country has placed a nuclear weapon into orbit, or is ready to do so. This crossed the line with the Visiting Others and they have dictated to the U.S. that disclosure must be made.
- Terrestrial Controllers have decided to upgrade the global threat because they can’t handle the current terrorist threat scenario.
- The evolution of consciousness on Earth has reached a level that warrants disclosure.
- This is simply the schedule that the Visiting Others have decided upon, and deliberately provoked Earth to take action by increasing the number of sightings.
One of the most difficult intelligence collection tasks is to determine "intentions." Some politicians are not shy to equate intentions with capabilities. But these are merely assumptions and no logical link can be made. The extraordinary technological capabilities demonstrated by the Visiting Others do not predict either benign or aggressive intentions.
It is much easier to discuss the intent of the U.S. government related to disclosure. It is first to survive the event by controlling it as much as possible, and then to capitalize on opportunities as they develop. These intentions are what we would expect from our government. However, there are issues that arise from these assumed government intentions that spring from sixty years of government lies and disinformation about the subject that disclosure will relieve.
Perhaps the maximum expectation from a government statement about disclosure would be something like the following. The statement would be made by the President and -
- explains in detail why the public was subjected to the massive disinformation program,
- identifies the agencies and people involved in our country,
- identifies all other countries involved and the roles they played,
- explicitly identifies what was gained during this period that justified such deceit,
- fully apologizes to the country and the world,
- identifies the new procedures that will keep this from ever happening again,
- explicitly identifies what we can expect to gain from disclosure,
- states that we will be vigilant as we move through the process, and
- affirms that the Visiting Others are willing to appear when invited by the people. . That may be too much to expect for the first announcement, and more than the public could handle at one time. Subsequent announcements should come from recognized senior military and intelligence officials, civil authorities, and in close sequence
This will be a scary and confusing time. A chorus of "I told you so, and you lying Bastards" would not be helpful. The moment calls for calm, truth, and education leading to a period of discussion and assimilation.
This period of assimilation may take a long time, but we will know it is over when there is a growing voice from the people saying, "Well, where are the Visiting Others?"
Disclosure and overt contact are two important and separate issues. Contact follows assimilation of the truth of disclosure. Because of the high potential for emotional overload, it would be unwise to invite any of the Visiting Others to participate at the announcement event, even those who are highly anthropological.
However, it would be important for the President to bring a message from them that answers basic questions and raises the most important one:
- Who they are, where they are from, how long have they been associated with Earth,
- Why disclosure is being made now,
- What they expect to get from disclosure,
- What they have to share with Earth
- When will the 10th Planet arrive and what will be the consequences to Earth,
- When they are willing to appear during daylight hours, and under what conditions
- Do you realize that our coming brings the family together?
This last item, the question about family, should provoke the organized religions that have been anticipating this event for many, many years to state their positions about the significance of what is happening. We know that the Vatican is prepared for this moment, and its public position on it suggests they have concluded that disclosure is at hand.
Revenge, Justice and Reconciliation
The deceit used against the U.S. public, the very serious constitutional issues involved, the emotional shock, and realization of the importance of opportunities lost or at least delayed, will so anger some people that they will demand revenge, legal and extra-legal, for what took place and for those responsible for the cover-up. The more moderate of these appeals will be made for a demand of justice.
It must be acknowledged that thousands of citizens have had non-consenting relationships with some of the Visiting Others. These encounters appear to have been part of medical and genetic research that we can assume was important to the Visiting Others. Justice is certainly owed to these citizens and their families, and it should come first from the Visiting Others in a form of special psychological and physical health support and benefits.
The larger issue is that an unmet cry for revenge, even when couched in terms of justice, can seriously disrupt and bias the process of disclosure. It will play into the hands of those who always emerge to capitalize on emotions in times of chaos and uncertainty.
The most practical strategy to address this eventuality is for the President to state at the first Disclosure announcement that he will remove all restrictions of security oaths signed by those involved in ET programs and their cover-up, so that these individuals may testify under oath to Congress for whatever investigation and legislation that body may plan. Additionally, they will be granted immunity for action done under orders in the ET programs and their cover-up. There are viable South Africa truth and reconciliation commission models that can be considered for this necessary action.
With all of the above commentary, the reader may be weary and has lost the thread of what Plan C is about. It is designed for three important purposes: (1) prepare the global public for disclosure, (2) influence the strategy for disclosure by the terrestrial Controllers to achieve the most positive outcome for everyone, and (3) send a message to the Visiting Others that we are concerned, determined and vigilant, trying hard to prepare for and to implement Disclosure, and that we expect them to honor the complexity of the problems we are trying to handle. For them to release a batch of doves or some other recognized symbol of peace might be helpful, but not adequate to assuage the natural fear that most humans will have to handle. We will need time, and lots of it after Disclosure is made, to educate the population about the significance of the larger reality in their lives.
Expectations.
The expectations game is easy to play, and it would be a dangerous strategy for terrestrial Controllers to raise expectations of wondrous gifts that would follow disclosure and contact. There is little doubt that the Visiting Others could "solve" the world’s energy, food and health problems by sharing technology unknown to us. That will not happen. The reasons are obvious. The first is that we have done nothing to deserve such a shocking infusion of knowledge, and more importantly, such gifting would shatter the world’s economic and political system.
What may be helpful is a special project of Plan C: Earth Disclosure. The project will be introduced during Plan C’s Phase Three - International Polling, and hopefully the Visiting Others’ response in Phase Six.
One polling question will be: Do you believe that there is adequate Earth-based knowledge to greatly ameliorate current crises in energy, food, health and sanitation? Follow-on questions will give the respondents opportunities to take responsibility for Earth’s sad and dangerous condition. The Earth Disclosure project will lay the foundation for a global Oasis strategy that envisions every country having one or more Oasis. In an Oasis, an assembly of highly creative minds will address energy, food, health and sanitation issues. A list of hopeful solutions in each area will be drawn up, and the Visiting Others will be requested to prioritize each list, with the highest priority given to the approach most likely to be successful.
Earth Disclosure will not be viewed with pleasure by the existing world economic and political power structure. We will find out quickly and with precision if the dominant Visiting Other groups are really interested in Earth’s survival. The proof will be their willingness to identify the priority research, and then to assure that the fruits of this research are openly shared with all the people of the world.
It is obvious that P.E.A.C.E. Inc sees the need for and is trying to initiate the transformation of Earth. The transformation we seek is spiritual, love-based compassion and respect for all life. We have little hope that organized religions are capable of making a positive contribution to this undertaking. The dark history of religions’ contributions to war and violence is well known. It is the consequence of claims of God’s special favor, and being the gatekeeper of an exclusive pathway to salvation. Every revelatory religion is headed for a humbling transformation or a withering away if the Visiting Others reveal something stunning about the origins of humankind and open an unexpected curtain on the nature of God.
The Oasis concept of self-deliverance would never be allowed to operate without the protective force majeure of the Visiting Others.
The concept of the Earth Disclosure project is work in progress, and will only be possible if the Visiting Others agree to support it. The not so secret, secret government will easily survive a successful Earth Disclosure program, and eventually will run it, as there will be great profit margins involved. However, it has the potential of greatly changing the dismal global status quo. The world’s gene pool only supports a relatively small number of geniuses. In countries with high infant death rates, this vital cadre is harvested by something as preventable as dysentery. It is in the world’s vital interest to assure the survival of the brightest.
Will the Visiting Others support Earth Disclosure? They may give it a try because it contains the seeds of maximizing human potential. The flowering of that increases the odds that non-violent solutions to problems become more visible and believable.
Revisiting the Brookings Institution Report of 1960
As it stated, "Since intelligent life might be discovered at any time. . . and the consequences of such discovery are presently unpredictable," the authors of the Report recommended two study areas: "Continuing studies to determine emotional and intellectual understandings, and attitudes - and successive alterations of them if any - regarding the possibility and consequences of discovering intelligent extraterrestrial life," and "Historical and empirical studies of the behavior of peoples and their leaders when confronted with dramatic and unfamiliar events and social pressures." Footnotes to these recommendations contain the most often cited comment from the Brookings Report, "It has been speculated that, of all groups, scientists and engineers might be the most devastated by the discovery of relatively superior creatures, since these professions are most clearly associated with the mastery of nature, rather than with the understanding and expression of man." I suspect that this analysis would now be considered quaint in view of the ride that fires, floods, earthquakes, tornadoes, typhoons and global warming are giving all of us. There may be a few scientists and engineers still wearing their Master Capes, but most have dust on their knees from honoring the ageless reality of nature. Give them another 100,000 years to work the problem, and things might change a bit.
Did NASA or some other organization accept the recommendation to continue to study the issue? There is nothing in the public domain to answer the question. However, it was such a reasonable recommendation that I strongly suspect that there are at least bi-annual reports, appropriately classified, and candidate documents to be used when the full flood of disclosure is underway.
In some significant way, Earth’s violence appears to threaten the Visiting Others. They clearly could end that game if that was their intention. As long as the fiction of being alone in the cosmos is maintained, the Terrestrial Controllers can avoid modifying their patterns of economic and political control. When disclosure is made, a new game will emerge. With a good plan, hard work, luck, and Visiting Other support, there will be an opportunity for a shift in consciousness honoring peace and justice.
Scott Jones
C.B. Scott Jones, Ph.D. President, P.E.A.C.E. Inc
May 28, 2008
P.E.A.C.E. Inc. • P.O. Box 290707 • Kerrville TX 78029-0707 • USA • Tel: 830.895.0770 Fax: 830.895.0771 • email: sherlight@peaceroom.com • Web site: www.peaceroom.com
garuda Co-Administrator Award for Phenomenal Creativity and Insight. Medal of Initiative Award member is offline
Joined: Dec 2006 Gender: Male Posts: 3,264 Karma: 134
Re: When ET lands: Scott Jones' Plan C « Reply #3 on May 31, 2008, 7:27pm »
The link in the text above got a bit messed up by Proboards in that it added the 'full stop' of the sentence to the URL, which led to a non existing site, and therefore to a message of the site not being online.
Re: When ET lands: Scott Jones' Plan C « Reply #4 on Jun 3, 2008, 10:52pm »
Nice find Garuda, thanx for sharing this
Quote:
It must be acknowledged that thousands of citizens have had non-consenting relationships with some of the Visiting Others. These encounters appear to have been part of medical and genetic research that we can assume was important to the Visiting Others. Justice is certainly owed to these citizens and their families, and it should come first from the Visiting Others in a form of special psychological and physical health support and benefits
I read the whole thing and everything sounded great until I read the above statement:
Why would any abductees want or need special psychological and physical health support and benefits especially from the Visiting Others.
If I were an abductee this would be my response unequivocally:
-------------------------------
Tell me if our governments were complicit, ask me for forgiveness if you were, but never ever assume that I would subject myself or my family to further invasion of my psyche under the premise of helping me cope with what was done to me and/or mine. I want nothing from you other then an apology and acknowledgement with full recognition to the world as a whole that what you did was wrong.
My expectation after disclosure?
That you will do everything within your power to ensure no harm ever befalls my family or me ever again.
BTW I'm extra superstitious so you may need to work extra hard to ensure lightening doesn't strike me and/or one of mine.
-------------------------------
And if what I'm reading is right I hope they understand this warning:
Have you ever seen or felt pure unadulterated rage released as controlled kinetic energy, believe me storms of magnitude would pale in comparison.
-------------------------------
If you don't believe me then what is it you hold back and bind inside of yourself, ever felt it, or played with it, does it scare you?
Think hard how much rage does the world population hold in its heart that it refuses to release? Now disclose all you want and release this rage.
Now that your mind is wrapped around this properly what makes you think that a measured, loving, and caring approach will be met with any less rage if it is not truly sincere, and beyond the scope of trying to save one's own hide? There is no immunity in this; trying to find an acceptable message to deliver is not going to change the fact they took the benevolence of the public for granted. A public that is wide-awake does not forgive empty promises or accept words of comfort that are readily recognized as seduction. If you ask me you've got yourself one heck of a problem.
------
Sorry if it's a buzz kill but that irked me into a really strong response for some reason. Perhaps just a poor choice of words on their part but darn if that didn't awaken a beast in me.
Joined: Mar 2008 Gender: Male Posts: 477 Location: Virginia Karma: 104
Re: When ET lands: Scott Jones' Plan C « Reply #5 on Jun 4, 2008, 9:24am »
Oh man, thanks for posting this, what a gold mine! I love it when an agenda is so clearly spelled out in one place. Most of this I have come across before in other... interesting... sources. My personal observations and interpretations of various parts:
Quote:
The agenda of Plan C is to solicit and assemble the best-informed and enlightened minds of the entire world to contribute skill and knowledge as to how to present us as a species in our best interests and intelligent interaction with Visiting Others of widely varying types. [...] This will be a body of intellectual material from individuals, universities and global think tanks that address, from the region and cultures...
I am concerned over who will do the selection, what subjective standards are used to qualify a person to participate this, and whether these people are not pre-selected according to their programmed biases, suggestibility, ignorance of what's really going on with the alien presence, and credentialed authoritativeness to convince the gullible.
Quote:
Phase Two, the material of Phase One will be collected, compiled, translated and disseminated broadly around the world in multiple languages.
Phase Three will involve international polling to measure public response to the disseminated material of Phase Two. Polling will largely be via the Internet, with sample polling in areas not adequately covered by the World Wide Web. From this phase a People’s Manifesto of Expectations will be prepared. It will be presented to the President of the United States, all other Heads of States, and others.
Couple problems with this. First is that democracy allows the uninformed majority to override the informed minority. No I don't advocate tyranny either, just saying that's the darkside of democracy. Public opinion is easily swayed through propaganda, appeal to narrow and incomplete assumptions, and the influence of authoritative appearance which a think tank of highly esteemed individuals would surely garner. I would expect this ploy to use the compiled material to be founded on false assumptions that manipulate the less discerning minority of the world into later influencing policy decisions of leaders acting on the polls, all according to design. That is, to ultimately sanction an agenda under the guise of freewill and democracy.
Not to mention, a planetary poll signifies the will of a civilization, which, if there are interplanetary freewill laws barring intervention by hostile aliens unless a planet wills it, would be enough to legalize such an intervention.
Quote:
An international board of directors composed of thirteen women and men with experience in fields of science, religion, education, medicine, military, business, media, entertainment, and intelligence, will be selected by lots from recommendations made by professional organizations of these fields. The Board of Directors will name the foundation, assist in fund raising, and approve the implementation plan of each phase.
That is a lot of power concentrated into a small-area. Thirteen men and women is also small enough to rig the selection process.
Quote:
The first questions concerns timing: why disclosure now? Has the second generation of Terrestrial Controllers lost their nerve, grown senile, got religion? Is there serious concern that the terrorists’ war threat may spin out of control, and must be trumped by a larger potential threat? There is no inconsistency in presenting disclosure in terms of hope and opportunity with future intent to label it as a threat. This is a well-established strategy.
This discussion has taken a dark turn from the opening paragraph of this section, i.e., from hope and opportunity to a fear and threat.
I have heard this many times before, it's the old reliable "paranoid government staging alien threat to consolidate power" idea. Reagan's quote being the most famous example. The problem is that this is strictly an "Independence Day" scenario that totally ignores the possibility of hostile aliens taking on a benevolent and peaceful guise to achieve their aims.
By limiting discussion strictly to the idea that negative aliens are necessarily violent, that idea can then be conveniently contradicted by this next part to create the illusion that aliens must therefore be benevolent:
Quote:
It is significant that we can discuss exopolitics with knowledge that Earth and its global population has never been attacked by the Visiting Others.
It could be that their interest in us is based upon our extraordinary violent and covetous attributes. That may be rare in their circle of friends.
It should not alarm a potential friend if we maintain a prudent defense posture. It simply acknowledges an accepted fact. The universe is home to many species, some of which have demonstrated a capability to visit us. If any of these intend to treat us as we treat each other, we will need a defense.
We have never been attacked in modern times on a wide scale. Yet. But we don't need to be attacked to be subjugated either. All we have to do is peacefully vote away our freedom for some trinkets. Oh wait...
Quote:
Maybe we have not been attacked because, except for the beauty of Earth, there is really nothing here that they don’t already have, or by basic nano technology can create.
"Nothing here that they don't already have, or by basic nano technology can create." That is assuming a materialistic paradigm. You have to get into the occult / metaphysical / hyper-dimensional / esoteric paradigms to get an idea of what they want that they can NOT create by themselves -- like soul energy, dominion over probable futures sprouting off from this moment in our history, better physical vehicles for more potent expressions of their volition, etc...
Quote:
Perhaps the maximum expectation from a government statement about disclosure would be something like the following. The statement would be made by the President and -
- explains in detail why the public was subjected to the massive disinformation program,
- identifies the agencies and people involved in our country,
- identifies all other countries involved and the roles they played,
- explicitly identifies what was gained during this period that justified such deceit,
- fully apologizes to the country and the world,
- identifies the new procedures that will keep this from ever happening again,
- explicitly identifies what we can expect to gain from disclosure,
- states that we will be vigilant as we move through the process, and
- affirms that the Visiting Others are willing to appear when invited by the people.
I know that is just a hypothetical scenario, but it shows a revealing angle. The first thing to notice is that "disinformation" there is implicitly limited to the government suppressing the existence of aliens. As if that were all there was to disinformation. How about government disinformation concerning alien motivations, promulgating naive assumptions about alien intentions and suppressing discussion of what the real motivations could be...? Example:
Quote:
One of the most difficult intelligence collection tasks is to determine "intentions." Some politicians are not shy to equate intentions with capabilities. But these are merely assumptions and no logical link can be made. The extraordinary technological capabilities demonstrated by the Visiting Others do not predict either benign or aggressive intentions.
It is much easier to discuss the intent of the U.S. government related to disclosure.
A simple White Hat/Black Hat dichotomy has merit. As much as we think we know and can prudently speculate about, there is much more that we do not know.
That whole issue of alien intention is typically sidestepped with the excuse that "we cannot know it" or "there is not enough proof to determine either way" and other agnostic excuses. False dichotomies are also used, as I've mentioned before. Well, there's a wide body of literature out out there that if analyzed, digested, and compared to personally verifiable experiences (if you are in contact with neg aliens and are smart enough to see through any decoys and fronts they project) provide plenty of necessary data to make highly plausible guesses as to various kinds of alien motivation. Seasoned and unbiased researchers and experiencers know what I'm talking about. Things are a little more complicated than we're told to assume, and too black/white a picture on the assumption that we do not know because we cannot know removes the possibility of even finding those shades of grey in the first place.
Quote:
However, it would be important for the President to bring a message from them that answers basic questions and raises the most important one:
- Who they are, where they are from, how long have they been associated with Earth,
- Why disclosure is being made now,
- What they expect to get from disclosure,
- What they have to share with Earth
- When will the 10th Planet arrive and what will be the consequences to Earth,
- When they are willing to appear during daylight hours, and under what conditions
- Do you realize that our coming brings the family together?
No contingency is made for the message being insincere or politically biased. How would the President and his informers know for certain who the Visiting Others are and why they are here? Probably based on what the Visiting Others have told them, which will have to be taken on faith and authority. Better questions would need to be asked, like "How can we guarantee that the Visiting Others are truly sincere and have our best interests in mind, and not just projecting that false facade as a means to accomplish a covertly hostile agenda? Are there alien factions that are more benevolent than others? If so, how do you distinguish between the truly positive aliens and the insincere ones?"
Quote:
- Do you realize that our coming brings the family together?
This last item, the question about family, should provoke the organized religions that have been anticipating this event for many, many years to state their positions about the significance of what is happening. We know that the Vatican is prepared for this moment, and its public position on it suggests they have concluded that disclosure is at hand.
[...]Every revelatory religion is headed for a humbling transformation or a withering away if the Visiting Others reveal something stunning about the origins of humankind and open an unexpected curtain on the nature of God.
Another revealing angle, the presumption that hooking up with the Visiting Others necessarily means the family coming together. Indeed we may be cosmic siblings, or we may be "livestock" being visited by the "rancher" -- depending on the alien faction, of course. If the latter, then the Vatican proclaiming loudly that all aliens are angelic and like our brothers would be a logical move. Religious authority has such deep hooks into the minds of man that he who pulls the hook, reels in the man!
Quote:
The most practical strategy to address this eventuality is for the President to state at the first Disclosure announcement that he will remove all restrictions of security oaths signed by those involved in ET programs and their cover-up, so that these individuals may testify under oath to Congress for whatever investigation and legislation that body may plan. Additionally, they will be granted immunity for action done under orders in the ET programs and their cover-up. There are viable South Africa truth and reconciliation commission models that can be considered for this necessary action.
This topic of amnesty was briefly discussed on the "Source A / Conformers" thread. My view is that regardless of the moral and practical nature of amnesty, one thing is certain: that those advancing the agenda thereby have total incentive to continue it to completion if they know they will be let off the hook if they can take it to completion.
Quote:
One polling question will be: Do you believe that there is adequate Earth-based knowledge to greatly ameliorate current crises in energy, food, health and sanitation? Follow-on questions will give the respondents opportunities to take responsibility for Earth’s sad and dangerous condition. The Earth Disclosure project will lay the foundation for a global Oasis strategy that envisions every country having one or more Oasis. In an Oasis, an assembly of highly creative minds will address energy, food, health and sanitation issues. A list of hopeful solutions in each area will be drawn up, and the Visiting Others will be requested to prioritize each list, with the highest priority given to the approach most likely to be successful.
Loaded question, the coerced answer is, "No, earth sucks right now because humans are dumb and irresponsible. We need alien leadership and technology to make things better, and we are willing to make some sacrifices to ensure our survival and prosperity through accepting such help."
This prompts me to end with an excerpt from "Extra-terrestrial Friends and Foes" by George C. Andrews:
It would be a mistake to count on them to clean up the mess we have made of our polluted planet, or to bring peace by dismantling our nuclear weapons. It is up to us to solve the problems that we have ourselves created. No one else will do this for us. Humans tend to make either Christ-figures or Satan-figures out of extra-terrestrial or inter-dimensional visitors, in order to absolve themselves from the responsibility for their own actions. This is a self-defeating strategy that does not work, that never has and never will. Awaiting a savior from the sky is a recipe for disaster. If we each do our very best to tilt the balance toward the continued improvement of our species and the quality of life on this planet, we stand a chance of resolving the immense problems we are faced with, but there are no guarantees. Christ-consciousness should not be confused with Christ. It is easy to kneel in awe. It is far more demanding to develop the full spectrum of awareness that Christ-consciousness. it is up to us to shape our own destiny. (Andrews, pp. 144)
Re: When ET lands: Scott Jones' Plan C « Reply #6 on Jun 4, 2008, 1:10pm »
Quote:
The most practical strategy to address this eventuality is for the President to state at the first Disclosure announcement that he will remove all restrictions of security oaths signed by those involved in ET programs and their cover-up, so that these individuals may testify under oath to Congress for whatever investigation and legislation that body may plan. Additionally, they will be granted immunity for action done under orders in the ET programs and their cover-up. There are viable South Africa truth and reconciliation commission models that can be considered for this necessary action.
Quote:
This topic of amnesty was briefly discussed on the "Source A / Conformers" thread. My view is that regardless of the moral and practical nature of amnesty, one thing is certain: that those advancing the agenda thereby have total incentive to continue it to completion if they know they will be let off the hook if they can take it to completion.
If ET is benevolent and here to help us then what is this need for amnesty? May I ask the question... How much have we lost already?
excellent observations montalk, and expressed nicely too
Re: When ET lands: Scott Jones' Plan C « Reply #7 on Jun 5, 2008, 2:25am »
This is a very nice idea. Very glad to see someone with Dr. Jones's level of credibility standing for such an endeavor.
BTW, amnesty/immunity is indeed an issue previously identified by Source A as integral to any government-sanctioned Disclosure effort. It's no doubt one of the most controversial topics in the entire Disclosure paradigm.
"Human history becomes more and more a race between education and catastrophe." H.G. Wells
Stay thirsty, my friends.
etherian Award for exceptional contribution member is offline
Tall and White
Joined: Jul 2007 Gender: Male Posts: 3,761 Karma: 87
Re: When ET lands: Scott Jones' Plan C « Reply #8 on Jun 5, 2008, 3:30am »
I appreciate what Montauk has laid out here. In much of what he states, he raises the fundamental questions that have dogged this program of disclosure for years.
At the same time these are not going to be questions that are answered and there is no one who really has the answers.
This is where we are at until "they" come and do their thing. Then and only then, we will know something, like it or not.
Sorry, B2, bud, I think that amnesty for the enigmatic secret keepers, is pretty low on the totem pole compared to these larger issues that Montauk has put out. To most of us here, this is fundamental. Are we going to be free with freewill with all the warts and scabs upon humanity, or are we going to be led by our noses into someone else's idea of the "Golden Age" or a new dark age.?
The old 1950s era "Invasion of the Body Snatchers" put it out there quite well regarding this dilemma that we may soon face.
Jake Reason Member of Distinction Member of Valued Recognition. Award for exceptional contribution. - Admin Emeritus member is offline
You must dive in to see it all
Joined: Feb 2006 Gender: Male Posts: 10,007 Location: Canada Karma: 134
Re: When ET lands: Scott Jones' Plan C « Reply #9 on Jun 5, 2008, 9:05pm »
Welcome Scott Jones.
In the bottom right hand corner of the most current post (on green bar) you will see; "reply | send topic to a friend | print"
Click reply and a new window will pop up with a white box. Simply type your message in this box.
You will see that there are several word processing tools above the white box, as well as smilies which you can use to enhance the look of your message.
You will further note that below the white box are four buttons.
Post Reply | Preview | Spell Check | Reset.
When you are satisfied with your message click "Post Reply" and you be returned to the forum where you will see that your post follows the last one.
Again welcome to the forum, we look forward to your participation.
This is a very nice idea. Very glad to see someone with Dr. Jones's level of credibility standing for such an endeavor.
BTW, amnesty/immunity is indeed an issue previously identified by Source A as integral to any government-sanctioned Disclosure effort. It's no doubt one of the most controversial topics in the entire Disclosure paradigm.
The presents of ET is going down like it or not! The bad guy's shall be exposed, and Yeshua shall take the earth quickly! Seems to be what I conclude after, over and over again putting the pieces of the puzzle together! It all comes back to prophesy! JMO
The presents of ET is going down like it or not! The bad guy's shall be exposed, and Yeshua shall take the earth quickly! Seems to be what I conclude after, over and over again putting the pieces of the puzzle together! It all comes back to prophesy! JMO
crossing place of the heaven and of the earth=Spirituality ??it's great to have an open mind not so open your brains fall out??
ps0 Guest
Re: When ET lands: Scott Jones' Plan C « Reply #12 on Jun 6, 2008, 8:24am »
Great post Montalk.
Quote:
When will the 10th Planet arrive and what will be the consequences to Earth,
I sure would like to know what Scott Jones knows about this!?! Well, if he is here [JR welcomed him in above post?], then please, by all means, Scott Jones, tell us what yopu mean by raising this particular question?
Surely you do not mean that planet X is real, and the Vatican expresses a real concern over this planet, since it will probably contain the very visitors that it has recently stated would be our sinless brothers and sisters?
Razpad Global Moderator Award for Media Creativity. OM Expeditionary Field Team Gold-Star Contributor Award member is offline
Joined: Sept 2007 Posts: 1,376 Location: Not within reach of that sign^ Karma: 151
Re: When ET lands: Scott Jones' Plan C « Reply #13 on Jun 7, 2008, 9:40pm »
It is indeed wonderful to have such a succinct (relatively) summary of the situation and approaches to it. I will reference this heavily in the future.
One thing that bothers me is that here, like in so many places, there is a lumping together in "Visiting Others" of many races with many agendas. It promotes a sort of us vs. them mentality at some level, as opposed to us joining a much larger and varied group of peoples. It may well be that single individuals or even governments are dealing primarily with single races, but I think it clouds the bigger picture.
One thing that bothers me is that here, like in so many places, there is a lumping together in "Visiting Others" of many races with many agendas. It promotes a sort of us vs. them mentality at some level, as opposed to us joining a much larger and varied group of peoples. It may well be that single individuals or even governments are dealing primarily with single races, but I think it clouds the bigger picture.
The Big Picture & Us vs Them. Good point Raz.
In my observation & studies, this situation has given rise 1) because of Biblical Prophecies 2) contactees & abductee testimonies of a dark future and/or insincere Alien motives intent on using us.
It appears that most everyone who studies this phenomena eventually stumbles across eschatology (prophecies of end times). Some avoid it, some take a closer look, and some delve deeply into it. Then there are those who are first well studied in eschatology that end up stumbling upon Ufology. hehe
The end result is that many ufologers begin to see connecting patterns with 1 and 2 above. Some will talk freely about it and some prefer to refrain from it. This predominantly because of the 'religious' implications, issues and various interpretations, in our collective. What one feels/thinks is 'politically incorrect', another feels the opposite.
Regardless of ones personal view, points 1 & 2 influence the collective view. And so an 'Us vs Them' is a reality in the hearts & minds of many.
However your point; "as opposed to us joining a much larger and varied group of peoples." is a good one IMO.
For as eschatology confirms many testimonies (2 above), it also points toward a relatively brief period of time in which mankind need be fearful of (less then a generation), followed by exceptional peace and extraordinary advancements, including increased longevity of human life upward of a thousand years.
And so as an eschatologist, I welcome your post as an encouragement and reminder. Joining a much larger varied group is something to look forward to.
OMF Books and DVD's - CLICK HERE
![[Home]](http://s4.images.proboards.com/menu/home.gif)
![[Help]](http://s4.images.proboards.com/menu/help.gif)
![[Search]](http://s4.images.proboards.com/menu/search.gif)
![[Login]](http://s4.images.proboards.com/menu/login.gif)
![[Register]](http://s4.images.proboards.com/menu/register.gif)
![[Search This Thread]](http://s4.images.proboards.com/search2.gif)
![[Send Topic To Friend]](http://s4.images.proboards.com/buttons/sendtopic.gif)
![[Print]](http://s4.images.proboards.com/buttons/print.gif)
Author
![[avatar]](http://www.lamiroy.com/download/garuda-movie-200.jpg)
![[homepage]](http://s4.images.proboards.com/buttons/www_sm.gif)
Logged
![[avatar]](http://i242.photobucket.com/albums/ff25/Broomstacker/spear.jpg)
![[avatar]](http://i276.photobucket.com/albums/kk40/wildmage_images/gyme.gif)
![[image]](http://i276.photobucket.com/albums/kk40/wildmage_images/yym.jpg)
![[avatar]](http://montalk.net/avatartemple.jpg){kind=avatar}
![[msn]](http://s4.images.proboards.com/msn.gif)
![[avatar]](http://img1.jurko.net/avatar_1343.gif){kind=avatar}
![[avatar]](http://i192.photobucket.com/albums/z268/humanoider/AvatarNine.jpg){kind=avatar}
![[avatar]](http://i24.tinypic.com/qn1i5j.jpg)
![[avatar]](http://www.ufoconspiracy.com/images/3_second_eben_full_view.gif)
![[avatar]](http://www.mariasphoto.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/aurora-borealis-6.jpg)
![[avatar]](http://i34.tinypic.com/1zvflmh.png)
