Attention: SCIENTISTS, PHYSICISTS and OTHER ASSORTED 'BACKYARD' SCIENTIFIC TYPES: LEARN FROM AN ACTUAL INSIDER THE SECRETS OF THE ALIEN PROPULSION SYSTEM AND WHY WE CAN'T 'CRACK' AND DUPLICATE IT! / LEARN WHAT MAKES THE ET CRAFT GO FROM POINT "A" to "B" WITH LITTLE FUEL ON HAND, BUT "WHICH CREATES ENORMOUS AMOUNTS OF ENERGY!" / UNDERSTAND WHY "2 + 2 = 5" IN THE REST OF THE COSMOS EXCEPT HERE ON PRIMITIVE PLANET EARTH! / LEARN THE PROPER PLACE FOR OUR QUANTUM PHYSICS and MECHANICS ... IN THE LATRINE! / THIS IS A "KEEPER!"
MODERATOR's NOTES and EXPLANATION: What follows is an exclusive interview between an Area 51 scientist and Linda Moulton-Howe conducted in April of 1995.
To the best of ANONYMOUS and the DIA-6's knowledge, THE CONTENTS OF THIS EXPLOSIVE INTERVIEW HAVE NEVER BEEN MADE PUBLIC perhaps due to the agreement Moulton-Howe entered into with the USG at the time of the interview.
In a telephone call I placed to the residence of Moulton-Howe on Sunday morning, 6-17-07, I have confirmed with her that the following interview never appeared on her Web site:
Regardless, ANONYMOUS has now directed me to release an abstract of the 5-page interview which is reproduced below.
As always, my OWN comments/notes are offset by the use of [ ] brackets.
BEGIN ------------------------------------------ This is raw intelligence material and dissemination to unauthorized personnel is prohibited.
This attachment was not given a security classification.
Interview with Dr Craig McPherson, scientist and former employee of Area 51.
Dr McPherson worked at Area 51 from May 1956 until September 1988. This interview was made by Linda Howe during a meeting at the Las Vegas Hilton on April 8, 1995. Under a written agreement between Linda Howe and Dr McPherson, the contents of the interview could NOT be made public. A U.S. government source recorded the interview. What follows is a summary of the information given by Dr McPherson.
NOTE: A background check of Dr Craig H McPherson was conducted. Dr McPherson obtained a security clearance based on an "Expanded Background Investigation" in August of 1956. The clearance was upgraded at various intervals until his retirement. Dr McPherson was a Federal Civil Service employee from May 23, 1956 until October 1, 1988.
Dr McPherson retired at the Federal Civil Service grade of GS-16. Dr McPherson was born on April 8, 1920 in Scranton, PA. Dr McPherson served in the U.S. Army Infantry in Europe from June 1944 until October 1946. Dr McPherson obtained the military rank of Sergeant at the time of his discharge. Dr McPherson attended Penn State University, the University of Pennsylvania and MIT.
Interview of Dr Craig McPherson by Linda Howe on April 8, 1995. Location: Las Vegas, NV. Time frame: 1224 hrs 1713 hrs.
[Dr Craig McPherson begins speaking.]
I served in the U.S. Army from 1944 to 1946. After discharge, I attended college and eventually obtained a PhD in physics. I worked for private industry from 1955 to 1956. In May 1956, I was hired by the U.S. Air Force as an Applied Physics Specialist.
My first assignment was at the Nellis AFB, NV, test facility. I worked at Indian Springs AFB, NV, for the first seven months. My work pertained to the examination of Foreign Technology. The foreign technology consisted of Soviet and Chinese equipment. Most of the equipment was obtained from a friendly government. The equipment consisted of tanks, electronics equipment, weapon systems and other related items.
During this time frame, the Air Force built an underground facility at Groom Lake. The construction started in 1955 and ended sometime during the summer of 1959. I worked in the Foreign Technology Applications Studies Division (FTASD). We had three (3) different facilities, two of them at Groom Lake and one at Indian Springs. We later obtained a facility at Tonopah.
Once the underground facility was ready, we moved in. This was sometime in early 1960. The facility was one of the biggest underground facilities ever built. We must have had over a billion square feet of space. In later years, the underground facility, code named "Deep Space," was expanded to include three (3) different levels.
I was involved in the research and development of the SR-71. We had several different aircraft on the drawing board. The FTASD had more than 65 scientists, technicians and military personnel assigned. Most of our work was very unique. We would obtain some information from the Foreign Technology Acquisition Group (FTAG).
This group obtained information from foreign governments or from intelligence agencies. Along with the studies of the foreign equipment that we had available at the facility, we could apply advanced scientific principles to further our own technology. We made terrific advancements during this time frame.
During this time period, I NEVER saw a UFO or anything resembling a UFO at the Groom Lake Test Facility. I did NOT see any ETs nor did I ever hear anyone mention that our government was reverse engineering an ET device.
In the summer of 1969, I was transferred from the FTASD to the Advance Studies Group (ASG). The ASG was a very secret group located in the second level of Area 51, Complex III. When I first entered the facility, I had to obtain an additional security clearance. During my in-briefing of the ASG, I was informed that our group was working on advanced research principles involving NONconventional flying devices.
I saw my first nonconventional device within a few days of being assigned to the ASG. The flying device was code named "Atlas-Tank" (AT). It was A FLYING SAUCER. I worked on specific physics problems associated with this unique design. We had manufactured the AT over a period of eight (8) years.
I was brought into the program during the latter part of the ground testing. We solved most of the unique problems, but we still could not get the AT to fly. Several different propulsion systems were used, but none of them worked. Sometime in 1973, I was given another security clearance. I was moved to another facility within Complex III. This was a new facility. I was assigned to the ASG-Alpha.
Once in the facility, I was given access to another "flying saucer." This appeared to be the same shape as the AT. However, it was code named "Blue Chariot." Although I did not have access to the interior of the BC, I did observe the outer area of the flying craft. At no time was I told that either of these flying machines were ET related. I worked in the Alpha branch for several months before moving back to ASG.
In 1973, a terrible accident occurred at the Complex III facility. The propulsion system on the BC was activated and an explosion occurred killing six (6) technicians. Actually, it was NOT an explosion. A bolt or plasma ball came out of the propulsion system and struck the technicians, VAPORIZING THEM. The BC was then taken to another facility, which was located in a very remote area of Area 51. This area was adjacent to the old above ground nuclear testing land.
Scientists learned how the propulsion system worked. They could activate the system, which would generate an enormous amount of energy. The energy could be formed into "balls of plasma" or a steady stream of energy. The system could generate energy equivalent to a nuclear explosion from a range of 0.1 kT up to 350 kT.
The strange thing about this energy system was the lack of radiation. The system could generate this enormous amount of power, but it would NOT leave any residual radiation. This puzzled scientists. When I retired in 1988, NO ONE could understand the system. They could activate it, but could NOT understand how it worked.
At no time was I ever told that the new propulsion system was given to us by ETs. Nor was I ever told that ETs provided us with any technology. We assumed the new propulsion system was developed by the Soviets. Although no one told us that the new propulsion system and the BC were ET related, we figured they that were.
We had our own private discussions about the technology. I could give you the technical details of the propulsion system, but that is still HIGHLY CLASSIFIED. I can say the system operates on some unknown principles. We tried, quite unsuccessfully, to apply our knowledge of physics, quantum theory and other principles to this new system.
In OUR science, there are two (2) basic types of bonds by which atoms form molecules ionic and covalent bonds. An atom is normally electrically neutral. It has the same number of positively charged protons in its nucleus as it has negatively charged electrons in captive orbits.
In THIS system things are different. There is an UNKNOWN METHOD by which the atoms are changed. Instead of ionic or covalent bonds, this new system creates a THIRD TYPE of bonding principle. This new type of bonding causes atoms to take on a different form. Atoms go from a normal state -- and when I say "normal," I mean normal in OUR science -- to a "multiplexed" form. In other words, the atoms are doubled or "piggy-backed" onto each other.
The atoms are somewhat mutated, but maintain their original shape. I KNOW THIS IS VERY DIFFICULT TO UNDERSTAND. That is why we still DON'T understand it. I'll give you a simple example.
If you can recall basic chemistry, you will remember that a hydrogen atom consists of a single proton -- the nucleus -- with one electron in a captive state. When two hydrogen atoms approach each other, their combined energy becomes lower if they SHARE their electrons. Well, in this new system, a hydrogen atom, subjected to this new system (inside this propulsion system) changes to a NEW principle.
First, when two hydrogen atoms approach each other, their combined energy level becomes MULTIPLIED through this strange bonding principle. So, instead of having a lower energy level, the energy is MULTIPLIED by the number of atoms of hydrogen that is bonded. If we used the QUANTUM IDEA to understand this, we would conclude that quantum principles do NOT work in this new system.
Normally, in our system, positively-charged ions attract and bond to negatively-charged ions to form molecules. This is NOT the case in this new system. It makes NO difference whether the ions are positive or negative as they bond together regardless of valence. We do know that inside this propulsion system, something causes these strange unnatural phenomena to occur.
Two plates of metal sit inside a chamber. This chamber is a vacuum. The chamber is a PERFECT VACUUM, that is, there is no outside air or other gases inside this chamber. A tube running from one chamber into another, pushes a gas inside. A third chamber forces still another gas to enter the first chamber. We know that the gases push against these two plates of metal and cause an ENORMOUS AMOUNT OF ENERGY TO BE CREATED.
Lastly, just before the gases are "mixed," there is a form of light that is focused against the outgoing energy. This light is of a lower frequency. Normally, in our quantum theory, a small frequency means a lower energy. However, is this system, the lower frequency of light was measured to contain an enormous amount of energy exerted upon this outgoing energy. When I left in 1988, we could NOT understand how the gases were mixed nor could we determine HOW the light was generated.
You ask about the metals inside this vacuum container. Quite intriguing. First, the metal strips are located inside Container #1. They are setting perpendicular to each other at exactly 6.54 cm apart. Each metal strip measures 18.45 cm x 9.43 cm. Each metal strip is 3.46 cm wide. The sides of the strips facing each other contain a shiny metal coating. The opposite sides contain a dull coating.
Looking at the metal strips from above, one will notice that another substance is sandwiched between the outer two substances. The materials in each of the metal strips have never been identified. We do know the density of the metal strips and the hardness as measured by the Mohs scale.
The density of the metal strips are 94.5 [9.45?] on the shiny side and 34.2 [3.42?] on the opposite side. I believe the density or specific gravity was measured by the conventional method, in that the value is grams per centimeter cubed. NOT being a metallurgist, I cannot make comments on these values. But what IS interesting is that these two strips of metals are located inside a somewhat round vacuum container. The outer coating of this container is also shiny.
You mention the gases. I am not a chemist. I knew very little about the gases contained in Containers #2 and #3. These gases are two distinct types. One is a gas-liquid type and the other is a solid gas. Don't ask me to explain these two; I don't believe that our chemical engineers could do that. I just know that once the device is activated, the two gases mix and create energy by some method.
I DON'T want my name connected to a story about ETs.
COVALENT BOND: A chemical bond formed when electrons are shared between two atoms. Usually, each atom contributes one electron to form a pair of electrons that are shared by both atoms.
IONIC BOND: A chemical bond formed between two ions with opposite charges. Ionic bonds form when one atom gives up one or more electrons to another atom. These bonds can form between a pair of atoms or between molecules and are the type of bond found in salts.
IONIC PROPULSION: Propulsion by the reactive thrust of a high-speed beam of similarly charged ions ejected by an ion engine.
KILOTON: The explosive force of 1,000 tons of TNT; a unit for measuring the power of thermonuclear weapons.
MOHS SCALE: Hardness is one of the chief ways used to recognize a mineral. It is a scale used to measure the relative hardness of a mineral by its resistance to scratching. In 1822, Friedrich Mohs [German-Austrian: 1773-1839] created a hardness scale based on assigning numbers to common minerals. The concept is that a harder mineral (one with a higher number) can scratch a softer one.
Other materials may be correlated to this scale. For example, steel used in a pocketknife is about 5.5 and glass is about 6, so glass can scratch steel, but a common pocketknife will NOT scratch glass.
From softest to hardest, the 10 minerals of the Mohs scale are:
talc = measuring 1 on the hardness scale gypsum = 2 calcite = 3 fluorite = 4 apatite = 5 orthoclase feldspar = 6 quartz = 7 topaz = 8 corundum = 9 (including ruby and sapphire) diamond = 10 / A mineral form of carbon that is extremely hard and transparent. It usually occurs as crystals shaped as octahedrons. Diamonds come from unusual structures similar to volcanoes called pipes; the diamonds are embedded in a mineral called kimberlite. Diamonds form at great depths under high pressure and temperature, then are carried to the surface in a kimberlite pipe. Because diamonds are hard and resist wear, they also survive passage from original locations into gravel deposits in rivers and on beaches.
The Mohs scale is a RELATIVE hardness scale (minerals relative to each other.) There are several more hardness scales. One scale is known as the ABSOLUTE HARDNESS scale:
It is unclear whether Dr Craig McPherson was giving hardness numbers on the Absolute scale, such as 94.5, while previously referring to the Mohs scale. Metals (such as a typical knife blade) can be above 50 on the Absolute hardness scale, and hardened steel can be 100 or more. ------------------------------------------ Sources: THE AMERICAN HERITAGE SCIENCE DICTIONARY, ISBN# 0618455043, $19.95, 695 pp.
DISCOVER THE SCIENCE ALMANAC: THE DEFINITIVE SCIENCE RESOURCE, ISBN# 0786887591, $13.99, 790 pp. ------------------------------------------ LATE-BREAKING RELATED DEVELOPMENT TO "Project SERPO" POSTING #24: ENORMOUS NEW HANGAR UNDER CONSTRUCTION AT AREA 51 ... IS ET MOVING IN PERMANENTLY COME NOVEMBER 2009?!
FLASH NOTICE: Here is an item of interest for the public, since our hard-earned tax dollars are involved, and hopefully, at work at the base for our "Visitor" friends! The estimated size is 200 ft x 500 ft and 100 feet tall.
After the Air Force took over in the late 1980s, the name Area 51 was officially changed to: AIR FORCE FLIGHT TEST CENTER, DETACHMENT 3 or AFFTC DET 3. This is still the official designation of the Groom Lake base.
İ 2007 Dreamland Resort.com / PHOTO: June 10, 2007 from Tikaboo Peak.
"If you could flick a switch and open your third eye, you'd see that we should never be afraid to die. Rise up and take the power back, it's time that the fat cats had a heart attack. You know that their time's coming to an end, we have to unify and watch our flag ascend." - Uprising - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KfblGznVLJo - www.Muse.mu
suspicioso Award for exceptional contribution member is offline
You can't ban reality
Joined: Jun 2007 Posts: 718 Karma: 62
Re: SERPO: POSTING #24: Area 51 Scientist tell-ALL « Reply #1 on Jun 20, 2007, 9:23pm »
A cursory literature search doesn't show up a "Dr Craig McPherson" with this history (no hits at MIT, for example, and no papers or theses registered in the physics corpus that I can find).
Interestingly, though, there is a Col. Craig McPherson, who happened to be Phillips' director of Military Spaceplane Technology Systems, and director of the Global Hawk UAV programme. He was presenting at military technology conferences up until 1999, and is probably too young to be a match.
CaliKid Global Moderator Award for Long Standing Devotion To Service member is offline
OOPArts
Joined: Sept 2006 Gender: Male Posts: 1,381 Location: Sunny California Karma: 28
Re: SERPO: POSTING #24: Area 51 Scientist tell-ALL « Reply #3 on Jun 21, 2007, 12:16am »
Is it just me or does this read like a prequel to the Bob Lazar story? Not a bad thing, I like Bob.
Sounds like the Dr. was working on only a portion of the project. High energy physics that don't follow the norm. Used in an Ion propulsion system.
Must be other on-board systems he was NOT working with? ( ie story lacks of mention of anti-grav, inertia dampening system, navigation, FTL drive, force shields, weapons, etc). No comments on other teams working in the vicinity?
Some dimensions on the AT or BC units would have been nice. Were these designed for short hops or long interplanetary journeys?
Do we know if the doctor is still alive? As others have mentioned (posted), he is not readily found on google. CaliKid
I thought that they were angles, much to my surprise, they climbed aboard their starship, and headed for the sky. ~ Styx - Come Sail Away
CaliKid Global Moderator Award for Long Standing Devotion To Service member is offline
OOPArts
Joined: Sept 2006 Gender: Male Posts: 1,381 Location: Sunny California Karma: 28
Re: SERPO: POSTING #24: Area 51 Scientist tell-ALL « Reply #4 on Jun 21, 2007, 12:41am »
Hmmm. Trying to wrap my brain around this one. A few first thoughts.
Piggy backed atoms with multiplied energy, did this occur within the mentioned vacuum chamber? Were the chambers and the propulsion system one and the same? (ie were chambers components of the propulsion system). Separate paragraphs, not so clear.
The two gases that pressed on the metal strips (to make power), they were unknown? Not ever a Spectral analysis available? Funny since the elements of the "Light" were so clearly described (wonder what exact frequency the light was?). Must either be an element or compound with specific characteristics. Must be a key component to the system, hard to believe there was not mountains of data on it (them, the two gases).
Speaking of the light, did it just appear from nowhere? saying they could not determine how the light was generated is vague. Were there emitters present? Maybe LEDs that they could not determine the power source for? Or did the light appear from nowhere? Possibly it was the gasses fluorescing?
The use of energy as a noun in a few sentences seems off. Would not "ion stream" or "exhaust force" be more descriptive?
Quote:
Lastly, just before the gases are "mixed," there is a form of light that is focused against the outgoing energy.
I thought that they were angles, much to my surprise, they climbed aboard their starship, and headed for the sky. ~ Styx - Come Sail Away
suspicioso Award for exceptional contribution member is offline
You can't ban reality
Joined: Jun 2007 Posts: 718 Karma: 62
Re: SERPO: POSTING #24: Area 51 Scientist tell-ALL « Reply #5 on Jun 21, 2007, 8:45pm »
Quote:
Do we know if the doctor is still alive? As others have mentioned (posted), he is not readily found on google. CaliKid
Actually, I searched the MIT database and thesis archive, the OpenDOAR papers repository, and a range of other academic sources - not just google. Its very rare for even a military scientist to not publish any papers or appear in any citations. If anyone has access to ISI and SCI that would be worth a look, too.
suspicioso Award for exceptional contribution member is offline
You can't ban reality
Joined: Jun 2007 Posts: 718 Karma: 62
Re: SERPO: POSTING #24: Area 51 Scientist tell-ALL « Reply #7 on Jun 22, 2007, 3:27pm »
Quote:
unless all his work was confidential to the government group
Highly unlikely - you don't get to be a government physicist at all without publishing your work. Sometimes a PhD thesis will be emargoed, usually for commercial sensitivity, but overall its not likely that someone will be promoted to a high-level scientific team without any external credentials, as proven via publications.
CaliKid Global Moderator Award for Long Standing Devotion To Service member is offline
OOPArts
Joined: Sept 2006 Gender: Male Posts: 1,381 Location: Sunny California Karma: 28
Re: SERPO: POSTING #24: Area 51 Scientist tell-ALL « Reply #8 on Jun 23, 2007, 11:31pm »
My friend, Retired Rocket Science Guy (RRSG) had a few comments in a recent phone call.
1) He called in a favor with an acquaintance at MIT. The name "Dr Craig McPherson" was nowhere to be found in official MIT records. He said this was not unusual if the military "paid" for his education. May or may not be significant. Possible this name is a pseudonym or anagram?
2) Also spoke with RRSG about the "piggy back" atoms scenario. Chem101. He used two Oxygen atoms to demonstrate the point. When two single atoms of Oxygen exist (O), they are in a high energy state seeking to bond with another element like another Oxygen atom. When this binding occurs it produces something we are all familiar with, O2. The resulting molecule exists in a lower state of energy that requires a great deal of external energy to break the bond. In the Dr's report, the bonded pair will remain in a high energy state.
Does not make sense in traditional chemistry, but then the Dr's report stated it did not make sense to him either.
3) Found it difficult to believe a physicist would claim ignorance about chemistry. Impossible to even get an undergraduate degree in physics without a firm understanding of chemistry.
4) 1,000,000,000sq/ft of underground facilities (in 3 levels) seemed excessive. RRSG seemed familiar with the geology of the area. Said it was sedimentary formation that would not support such a facility on loose dirt with no bedrock. No mistake that SAC is built in Cheyenne Mountain (solid granite) Underground area this large would shift and sag. Assuming the 1(B)illion sq feet were divided equally for all 3 levels = 12 sq/miles per level. 1,000,000,000/3levels = 333,333,333.33 sq ft/level 333,333,333.33 sq ft/9 sq ft = 37037037.037sq yds 37037037.037sq yds/30.25 sq yds = 1224364.860728 sq rods 1224364.860728 /160 sq rods = 7652.28037955 acres 7652.280379545/640 acres = 11.95 sq miles
5) The balls of plasma were a puzzle. When the "chambers" were described (he said the bars in the chambers were perpendicular, but the size description seemed to indicate they were parallel), no "exit" was designated? Was there a port or nozzle that directed the output of the chamber in the form of these balls?
6) RRSG had a few comments about the hardness scales. Funny the Dr claimed ignorance, and then proceeds to quote hardness. Also the measurements of hardness on one side being different from the other side is problematic. It can be measured, depending on the annealing (sp?) process used to bond the materials.
6) Overall, many details seemed lacking. RRSG found the story interesting, thought either it was a fabrication or the lacking details may have been left out on purpose to avoid legal entanglements.
I thought that they were angles, much to my surprise, they climbed aboard their starship, and headed for the sky. ~ Styx - Come Sail Away
suspicioso Award for exceptional contribution member is offline
You can't ban reality
Joined: Jun 2007 Posts: 718 Karma: 62
Re: SERPO: POSTING #24: Area 51 Scientist tell-ALL « Reply #9 on Jun 25, 2007, 8:53pm »
great job, CaliKid.
I don't think this one rings true, myself. I'm willing to forgive a few things as possible verbal slips or transcription errors (e.g. maybe he meant a billion cubic feet), but overall it doesn't feel right.
Perhaps its worth mentioning that in my job I constantly encounter military research people from various services in their academic role. The military tends to hide sensitive research projects, not researchers!
So, what does this mean for the "transcript"? Is it simply fake, or is it set up to reveal something else below the surface? Interesting coincidence that the only "Dr Craig McPherson" you can Google is the Global Hawk director - is the UAV programme more than it seems? (Trying to get into the spirit of things here rather than go "what a load of...")
Lee Co-Administrator (AKA ufonaut) Award for Exceptional Services to OMF Administration. member is offline
Joined: Feb 2006 Gender: Male Posts: 2,563 Location: Yorks/Lancs Border, UK Karma: 136
Re: SERPO: POSTING #24: Area 51 Scientist tell-ALL « Reply #10 on Jun 25, 2007, 9:18pm »
The name Craig McPherson can also be found HERE He was named as one of the scientists who had access to "The Program" in Release #19:
Norris E. Bradbury, Jr, Los Alamos/DOE Craig McPherson, DOE/EG&G Dean L. Housman, Sandia Charles A. Delormonte, Sandia Jonathan K. Doty, Sandia Barbara K. Shipman, White House Intelligence Nicholas O. Bausmenta, MIT Harold Zirin, Calif Institute of Tech
It would be very nice to track him down, but we had no luck finding him back then either.
"I am a clone, I am not alone. Every fibre of my flesh and bone is identical to the others. Everything I say is in the same tone, as my test tube brother's voice. If you had ever seen us, You'd rejoice in your uniqueness and consider every weakness something special of your own." - Hawkwind - Spirit of the Age
magooollo Award for exceptional contribution OM Media Mailman member is offline
Joined: May 2007 Posts: 5,075 Karma: 42
Re: SERPO: POSTING #24: Area 51 Scientist tell-ALL « Reply #11 on Jun 26, 2007, 10:01am »
Re: SERPO: POSTING #24: Area 51 Scientist tell-ALL « Reply #12 on Oct 29, 2007, 10:49pm »
Hello all:
Rodin is still here. I had been following the "Drone" sightings and just came back to this Serpo Release. There was just nothing that my talents could add further to that Drone discussion.
So, I started to review some of the older Serpo releases. I hope that the following "curls as many toes" as it did for me. However, I fear that this will become lost in the hurry to digest the next Release due tomorrow morning.
Hopefully, there will be some data that I can digest in tomorrow's release. Until that time, I can only offer my following research update......
WOW!!! What a difference it can make to take a break on a subject and then reacquaint yourself with it at a later date!! As I was reading through this release, once again, several ideas popped into my mind!!
A bit of investigation and research and I now have developed a "plausible" theory that not only explains the "stated" chemistry and physics, but does so "nearly" within our present chemistry and physics "belief systems."
This was some really good stuff for me!! I found myself wanting to smack myself in the head due to its simplicity and yet I wondered why I (or others) hadn't though of this theory previously.
Ok, this theory is still thinking outside the "accepted" box and may be dismissed by those with a strong background in chemistry, physics, or quantum mechanics. But, I "suggest" that there is still much more that we don't know about chemistry, physics, and quantum mechanics than we presently understand.
Especially when we are just beginning to understand what the "rolling" up an element or compound can do for us. I humbly submit nano-tubes and buckyballs as new examples of this atomic level "rolling" phenomena.
My research strictly pertains to the chemistry and physics mentioned in this release and I did not try to explore any of the "facility" details that were revealed. I don't think that any of us have the time or resources for that type of research.
OK, so let's dig in!!!!
Release #24 states:
"In OUR science, there are two (2) basic types of bonds by which atoms form molecules ionic and covalent bonds. An atom is normally electrically neutral. It has the same number of positively charged protons in its nucleus as it has negatively charged electrons in captive orbits.
In THIS system things are different. There is an UNKNOWN METHOD by which the atoms are changed. Instead of ionic or covalent bonds, this new system creates a THIRD TYPE of bonding principle. This new type of bonding causes atoms to take on a different form. Atoms go from a normal state -- and when I say "normal," I mean normal in OUR science -- to a "multiplexed" form. In other words, the atoms are doubled or "piggy-backed" onto each other.
The atoms are somewhat mutated, but maintain their original shape. I KNOW THIS IS VERY DIFFICULT TO UNDERSTAND."
Additionally,
"Normally, in our system, positively-charged ions attract and bond to negatively-charged ions to form molecules. This is NOT the case in this new system. It makes NO difference whether the ions are positive or negative as they bond together regardless of valence. We do know that inside this propulsion system, something causes these strange unnatural phenomena to occur."
OK, so some sort of bonding is happening that doesn't fit "naturally" within our presently accepted atomic (quantum) chemistry modeling.
So, we have two gases being mixed and they are under-going some sort of reaction that forms more stable atoms or compounds in a vacuum chamber!! This reaction releases energy that is the power source for some sort of "system" on the craft.
I call this a "system" for a couple of reasons that I will detail further a bit later.
For some reason, I decided to consider these "gases" as noble gases!! Those would be gases with complete valence electron levels and are mainly considered inert (meaning that they are not very reactive with other elements!!)
Valence electron shells are the set orbital levels that electrons fill as different elements are formed.
In my mind, I theorize a "bastardized" form of covalent bonding. Principally, a mutated covalent bond that allows "minimally reactive" gases to share electrons among themselves!! Although, it may not be strictly limited to the noble gases!!!
Again from Release #24:
"First, when two hydrogen atoms approach each other, their combined energy level becomes MULTIPLIED through this strange bonding principle. So, instead of having a lower energy level, the energy is MULTIPLIED by the number of atoms of hydrogen that is bonded. If we used the QUANTUM IDEA to understand this, we would conclude that quantum principles do NOT work in this new system."
I don't know why they mentioned hydrogen as a potential gas. It only has one electron and initially I though that isn't going to help to form a "bastardized" covalent bond "chain" or assist with having the atoms, or molecules, "roll up upon themselves."
In my initial theory, I worked with Helium and another noble gas. I envisioned a chain of three atoms that held the Helium atom as its center. Pick whatever noble gas that you like as the other component!! Call it gas XYZ.
The Helium atom forms the center of a three atom chain and shares its two first level valence electrons with two atoms of gas XYZ!! One on each end of the chain. Here is where the "bastardized" bonding comes into play......
Gas XYZ "somehow" (I'll try to address this later.) shares some of its lower energy electron orbitals with the higher energy, 1st level electrons of the helium atom. This would kick out two electrons (The helium doesn't need them anymore as it is sharing an (lower energy) electron from each of two atoms of gas XYZ!!) and some amount of energy is released.
Then, as I was trying to understand the input of a beam of light, the metal strips, and the vacuum, the word "photon" came to mind and slapped me in the face!!!!
So, I quickly checked Wikipedia for a brief understanding of photons!!
Before I go too far with the Wikipedia references, I began to re-envision a more complicated process that might yield more energy using hydrogen as its source. The Release states that hydrogen is one of the gases. Call it the gas from chamber 2. (chamber 1 is the mixing/vacuum chamber!!) Chamber 3 contains the other "unknown" gas.
In my theory, the "other" gas is "induced" to react via means of the injected photon beam and a catalyst (metal strips) to share one of its orbiting electrons with the hydrogen atom. So, a lower energy (outer) valance electron (level?) from the "other" gas replaces (or partially replaces) the high energy valance electron of the hydrogen atom.
Now, this hydrogen atom only has this electron in orbit for a limited amount of time as it is now shared with the "other" gas. (Presumably, a larger sized atom and the electron would spend more time orbiting its "old" parent atom than the smaller sized hydrogen atom.)
So, if the hydrogen atom only has an electron present for a percentage of the time than its dedicated electron was available, it is now possible for additional electrons from multiple "other" gas atoms to share one of their similar valence electrons with the hydrogen atom.
So now, we can have multiple "other" gas atoms sharing electrons with a single hydrogen atom. Depending upon the actual number of electrons in the valance level (n) of the "other" gas atom, it is now possible for each "other" gas atom to react with multiple (n) hydrogen atoms.
Using this factor of "n," and the electrons available for this "bastardized" bonding process, we can start to relate to the "piggy-backing" or "folding" that was mentioned in this release.
I know that the Release specifically mentioned hydrogen as one of the gases, but suppose we can substitute helium or neon in the place of hydrogen and allow the "bonding" to occur in either the first and/or second valance (orbital) electron shell. Now, we have two to ten electrons that could be "bonded" between the hydrogen and the other "unknown" gas.
Somehow, I seem to recall a description in the Release as the bonding "folding" the atoms, and I don't seem to be able to find that specific quote at the moment. (It could just be my understanding of "multiplexed)."
As much as I hate to use Wiki as a reference since its entries can be modified without proper justification, I was feeling lazy and what I read fit well within my proposed theory.
OK, so, let's get some of the Wiki information out to support this theory......
"Photons are emitted in many natural processes, e.g., when a charge is accelerated, during a molecular, atomic or nuclear transition to a lower energy level,...."
Translation, (hopefully) when an electron shifts to a higher orbital electron shell in a specific atom!! OR, an electron is shared between two atoms and one of the atoms has substituted a low energy electron to stand in for a higher energy electron orbital of another atom.
Perhaps, it is possible to release a photon when a higher energy electron is replaced by multiple electrons from another atom. If the atom is sharing a lower energy level electron 50% of the time, does it emit half a photon, or does it take two two shared electrons to emit a complete photon?
Perhaps, half a photon is the wrong word to use. Surely, photons must come in different formats. "Half a photon" could still be emitted as a full photon, but just with a lower "visible" light energy level.
The Wiki photon reference had an interesting graphic to further demonstrate the net energy yield. But, it doesn't completely address the proposed "bastardized" covalent bonding process that I'm suggesting. So, we not only emit a photon of energy, but we also yield the output of an electron and the required "bonding" energy for this electron with this "suggested" reaction process!!??żż
Ok, a couple of other things that I considered in developing this theory.....
Chamber 1 is said to be "nearly" round. I envisioned more of an ovoid shape with gas intakes at 5 and 11 o'clock!!
Maybe, I'm exaggerating the lack of a "true" circular shape in my mind!!!
I'm also seeing the "perpendicular" metal strips as serving multiple purposes. Principally, they may act as baffles to ensure good mixing of the two gases. Then, their unknown metallic composition also serves as a catalyst to facilitate this "bastardized" bonding process!! I would submit the description of visually described differences between the "layers" of these metal strips as possible supporting evidence to this "catalyst" theory.
Chamber #2 is under a vacuum. Why do we need a vacuum for this process to occur?
I think that it may depend upon ones definition of a vacuum. To some, a vacuum may imply a total emptiness or a complete void of other matter. This makes sense to me to a certain point. We're injecting two "unreactive" noble gases into this chamber. In order to get the two noble gases to react, under optimum conditions, the way that we want, we can't have any other more reactive atoms in their presence.
However, I have to ask myself another question under this definition of a vacuum. Once we start to inject the two gases into the chamber, it is no longer a void. Though, it still only contains the atoms that we are interested in undergoing reaction.
I also looked at it in another different way as well. I defined a vacuum as a complete lack of pressure. (I'm just speculating here!!) But, without any external source of pressure, the electron shells "might" be able to draw further away from the nucleus of their atoms!! (Gravity??? on an atomic level???)
If we recall the graphic from wiki that I referenced earlier, the reaction won't occur without an input of photons of light. BUT, the release did say that a beam of light was projected ("focused") into the reaction chamber.
What I would suggest would be that the lack of pressure and the beam of photons would be enough to expand the electron orbital shells to a higher, yet not a full electron orbital shift. Thus a lower electron energy level, but not a complete electron energy level.
A partial electron (photon) level up to a lower energy field and then, once the electron is shared between the two differing atoms, we get the release of a full photon and an electron as well!!
I also find it interesting that we use neon and argon gases in making illuminated lights to grab our attention in advertising signs. We inject electricity (power) to excite the atoms and they give off light as we excited the atoms and allow them to return to their base state only to begin the process all over again!! I also would like to point out that the different "noble" gases" also emit a different color (wave length of light) when they are brought to their excited states!!
This makes me wonder if all "photons" are created equal?? Does the "energy" level of a photon dictate what color spectrum it may be viewed within? OR, looking at it another way, does the color of a "given" light say anything about its possible energy potential? What does this say about photons of light that are beyond our human visible range!!??
Is it that unrealistic to expect that should we inject light into those same elements that we might not get a release of energy???? Then, consider that same reaction to conditions under "vacuum??"
As I mentioned earlier, I would go into how this "system" was used. Under my hypothesis, for every photon that we injected into the reaction chamber, we would net two (or more) photons and two (or more) electrons. Plus, the energy that those two (or more) hydrogen electrons released by sharing their higher energy level with the "other" atom's lower energy level electrons.
Do we really have the complete release of two (or more) photons and two (or more) electrons for every photon put into the system under vacuum? (Pick your definition of a vacuum!!)
I'm asking myself some tough questions now. The Release stated that the drive system could release "plasma" to propel the vehicle. Well, are the "released" photons reabsorbed by the system or diverted elsewhere?
The way that I see this, we have three by-products from this "bastardized" reaction process, energy, photons of light, and released electrons. I haven't figure out if all of the different products are available as resources to power other "systems" in a space vehicle. Some of them may be reabsorbed to keep the reaction process going.
Are the photons or electrons sent off to be focused by other systems of the craft? Plasma beam weapon (strictly for defense!!), propulsion? Perhaps the wave length of light emitted is of the correct combination to make the craft "invisible" to human eyes??
Again, some of these "perceived" by-products may be needed to keep the reaction going?
Well, it's only a theory of mine. I haven't seen anything better out there and we can further discuss the finer points to make it an even BETTER theory.
etherian Award for exceptional contribution member is offline
Watch the Skies!
Joined: Jul 2007 Gender: Male Posts: 4,800 Karma: 227
Re: SERPO: POSTING #24: Area 51 Scientist tell-ALL « Reply #13 on Oct 29, 2007, 11:51pm »
Update on the hanger area today. Aviation Week just published and article relating the dimensions of the new building at Groom Lake. I will try and post an abbreviated version of the article. "the latest construction effort includes the erection of the largest hanger ever built at the remote Nevada site since it was established in 1955. In October the final touches to the exterior of the building were in process at a site southeast of the southern ramp area. Estimated to be almost double the size of Hanger 18.....the cavernous hanger is approximately 185' wide, 350' long and just under 100' tall at it's peak. the new hanger has double doors measuring 130'x70' and is connected to the field by a new 75'wide taxiway. A huge berm between the hanger and Runway 12/30, roughly 60' high hides all activity around the hanger from Tikaboo Peak, the only viewing site on public land some 26 miles distant. The mound nicknamed the "Masada Ramp" could act as a sound dampener. Repaving as well as expansion of aircrew prep facilities near Hanger 18 and a new building by the weapons storage site, south of the base. A three sided tower near 160-180 feet tall is located near the north ramp and close to a cluster of tracking radars, whose purpose is unknown. .........appears to have proceeded without serious interruption, as evidenced by the unveiling of previously classified and completely unknown projects such as the Boeing "Bird of Prey" and NorthrupGrumman Tacit Blue demonstrators. "But how many more projects are there yet to be revealed?" asks aviation author/historian Pete Merlin. ........Merlin calculates from public information that since the 1980s there are at least, "seven and as many as 11manned projects yet to be revealed. The upcoming flight test projects will be tackled by the Det.3 Special Projects Flight Test Sqdn, believed to be the USAF's only classified flight test squadron."
![[Home]](http://images.proboards.com/new/menu/home.png "[Home]")
![[New Topics]](http://s2.images.proboards.com/menu/topics.png "[New Topics]")
![[Help]](http://images.proboards.com/new/menu/help.png "[Help]")
![[Search]](http://images.proboards.com/new/menu/search.png "[Search]")
![[Login]](http://images.proboards.com/new/menu/login.png "[Login]")
![[Register]](http://images.proboards.com/new/menu/register.png "[Register]")
![[Search This Thread]](http://images.proboards.com/new/buttons/search2.png "[Search This Thread]")
![[Send Topic To Friend]](http://images.proboards.com/new/buttons/sendtopic.png "[Send Topic To Friend]")
![[Print]](http://images.proboards.com/new/buttons/print.png "[Print]")
Author
![[avatar]](http://fotos.fotoflexer.com/0d77bf2ef79874aaa6d13e34bdaa88a9.jpg "[avatar]")
![[homepage]](http://images.proboards.com/new/buttons/www_sm.png "[homepage]")
Logged
![[avatar]](http://lolfed.com/wp-content/uploads/oriskany.jpg "[avatar]")
![[avatar]](http://i61.photobucket.com/albums/h56/zllz_most_wanted_zllz/ancient_aircraft1.jpg "[avatar]")
![[avatar]](http://download.openmindsforum.com/av.jpg "[avatar]")
![[avatar]](http://i192.photobucket.com/albums/z268/humanoider/Avatar5.jpg "[avatar]"){kind=avatar}
