suspicioso Award for exceptional contribution member is offline
I'm just here for the cheese
Joined: Jun 2007 Posts: 486 Karma: 13
Re: Source Reveals Secret UFO Meeting at U.N. « Reply #1605 on May 6, 2008, 5:23pm »
Finally, some investigation news!
Date: 6 May 2008 Our Reference: 0201-08
International Organisations Department King Charles Street London SW1A 2AH Tel: 020 7008 3562 Fax: 020 7008 3744
[Redacted: My contact details]
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUEST
Dear [redacted],
I am writing further to my email of 7 April 2008 informing you that we judged the qualified exemption contained in s27 (international relations) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 to be engaged and that the public interest test would be considered. Furthermore, in order to consider the public interest in this case, we required an extension of the 20 working day response time limit permitted under the 2000 Act.
We are now in a position to respond to your request for information in which you ask for the details of all meetings at the United Nations in New York that were attended by Sir John Sawers (or his representative) during the period from 11 February to 15 February 2008.
PUBLIC MEETINGS
The UK Permanent Representative to the United Nations, Sir John Sawers, attended seven (7) official meetings at the United Nations between Monday 11 February and Friday 15 February 2008. These meetings were open to the full UN membership or to members of the UN Security Council. Details of these meetings can be found on the UN web site (www.un.org <http://www.un.org>) or at the specific sites listed below:
1800-1915 Lithuanian National Day (UN Delegates Dining Room, 4th Floor, UN Building); No record exists for this meeting
Thursday 14 February
Sir John Sawers (or his representative) attended no (0) official meetings on this day.
Friday 15 February
1000-1200 Security Council: Adoption of DRC Sanctions http://daccess-ods.un.org/access.nsf/Get?Open&DS=S/PV.5836&Lang=E resolution followed by briefing on African Union Mission to Somalia (AMISOM); Records for this meeting can be found at <http://www.un.org/> - Welcome - Documents, Maps - Meeting Records - 2008 - S/PV.5836
PRIVATE MEETINGS OF THE UN SECURITY COUNCIL (UNSC)
Sir John Sawers attended four (4) private meetings of the UN Security Council (listed below). Monday 11 February 1610-1615 Timor Leste (Security Council Consultations Room, UN Building) Wednesday 13 February 1000-1130 DRC Sanctions; Chad (Security Council Consultations Room, UN Building) Thursday 14 February 1500-1600 Private debate on Kosovo (Security Council Chamber, UN Building) Friday 15 February 1430-1500 Ethiopia/Eritrea (Security Council Consultations Room, UN Building)
Although it is public knowledge that these meetings took place and that the UK as a permanent member of the Security Council attended, these meetings were confidential diplomatic discussions. In the case of private meetings of the Security Council, the clear expectation of members of the Council is that such discussions will remain confidential. The same goes for Security Council consultations, which are private, informal meetings of the Security Council. Under the Provisional Rules of Procedure of the Security Council (which can be found at: http://www.un.org/Docs/sc/scrules.htm), meetings are held in public unless the Security Council decides otherwise. If any meeting of the Security Council is held in private, this indicates that the members of the Security Council consider that the subject matter of the discussion needs to be addressed without the glare of publicity to aid a free and frank exchange. It would undermine such necessary confidentiality if individual member States or the UN were to reveal their own records of these discussions while the issues are still live.
We therefore judge that the information we hold regarding these meetings to be exempt under sections 27 (1)(a),(b) and 27(2) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 which covers international relations.
BILATERAL MEETINGS
Lastly, Sir John Sawers held a number of bilateral meetings with UN officials and other UN delegations on a range of issues as part of his routine business as Permanent Representative, covering issues such as conflict situations on the agenda of the Security Council, development assistance and UN reform.
These meetings were conducted on the common understanding that the discussions were confidential exchanges of views, which would not be revealed. It would damage the United Kingdom's relations with other members States and with the UN itself if the UK Mission could not be relied on to maintain the confidentiality of such exchanges and would prejudice the Mission's ability to represent the UK's interests at the UN and other States or UN officials might become more cautious about the information they revealed. Similarly, we judge that the information we hold regarding bilateral meetings to be exempt under sections 27 (1)(a),(b) and 27(2) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000.
PUBLIC INTEREST TEST While there are good arguments in favour of disclosing this information such as the benefits of increasing public knowledge of the issues and of informing debate, we must also take account of and give appropriate weight to arguments in favour of withholding this information. In particular, the effective conduct of international relations depends upon maintaining trust and confidence between Governments and international organisations. Failure to maintain this trust and confidence would seriously hamper the United Kingdom's ability to protect and promote UK interests through international relations.
In considering the public interest, we have weighed these arguments and concluded that in this case disclosure of the records of these discussions (both private UNSC meetings and bilateral discussions) would prejudice the United Kingdom's relations with other States and with the United Nations. For these reasons we consider that the public interest in maintaining this exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosure.
If you are unhappy with the service you have received in relation to your request and wish to make a complaint, or request a review of our decision you should write to me at the above address. You have 40 working days to do so. Please remember to quote the reference number above in any future communications.
If you are not content with the outcome of that internal review, you may apply directly to the Information Commissioner for a decision. Generally, the ICO cannot make a decision unless you have exhausted the complaint procedure provided by the Foreign and Commonwealth Office. The Information Commissioner can be contacted at:
The Information Commissioner's Office Wycliffe House Water Lane Wilmslow Cheshire SK9 5AF
Yours sincerely,
Ursula Antwi-Boasiako International Organisations Department
Joined: Mar 2008 Gender: Female Posts: 2,866 Karma: 142
Re: Source Reveals Secret UFO Meeting at U.N. « Reply #1607 on May 6, 2008, 5:31pm »
Actually it does have a great deal to do with the UN Meeting. You are forming opinions on the viability of the information Source A is presenting regarding the UN Meeting. Part of those opinions are based on information or hypothesis as you term them that the ETs the gov is involved with is the Greys or akin ethically to them. This is based on an assumption that the internal situation in regards to allegiences are currently the same as those assumed 30 + years ago with no allowance for possible changes which may have occured. I am allowing an avenue for an educated guess if you will that something has changed somehow, somewhere if the ones Source A is speaking of are referred to as: 1. more ethical, 2. not the greys, 3. physical in nature based on Source A's personal experience interaction with them per his testimony innocent until proven guilty. I am exploring this line of verification to the viability of his claim that the UN Meeting existed by comparing his testimony on the ET type to that of 3+ other testimonies which are NOT imbedded in the government. I do not imply that all perceived experiences are based on factual experiences. Consider back the last time you or someone you know caught you sleep walking as a kid! When you awoke was there a conflict in memory? So yes this is a possiblity but I am doing my own checking based in 'giving the benefit of the doubt' if you will allow the phrase. If you expect honesty and fair play you must be willing to serve up that dish first yourself and then if it fails move on from there.
Joined: Mar 2008 Gender: Female Posts: 2,866 Karma: 142
Re: Source Reveals Secret UFO Meeting at U.N. « Reply #1611 on May 6, 2008, 5:56pm »
Dan, I have not asked you to stop posting in the UN Meeting Thread. What I have done is clarify the obvious physical framework to acknowledge that Source A is presenting information in a physical frame. I also am working from this point of view as is Suspicio in his quest for verification of the event. If Source A intended to address his presentation in or for spiritual purposes/consideration he would have presented it or framed it so. What I am suggesting is that we all agree to continue speaking the same language here. To switch to a spiritual frame would essentially switch the language and make it difficult for others to participate. Cyrellys
Joined: Mar 2008 Gender: Female Posts: 2,866 Karma: 142
Re: Source Reveals Secret UFO Meeting at U.N. « Reply #1612 on May 6, 2008, 5:58pm »
Suspicio, Source A mentioned the Indians haveing an issue on some sort of religious nature. Is it at all possible to check and see if any of them attended the various meetings in the information release? Perhaps we could narrow the field a bit this way?
The time of choice is here; in this moment that choice matters most. What does humanity choose to be?
dan 'DS Board' Moderator Award for exceptional contribution member is offline
Joined: May 2007 Posts: 8,959 Karma: 114
Re: Source Reveals Secret UFO Meeting at U.N. « Reply #1613 on May 6, 2008, 6:17pm »
Cyrellys,
Quote:
Dan, I have not asked you to stop posting in the UN Meeting Thread. What I have done is clarify the obvious physical framework to acknowledge that Source A is presenting information in a physical frame. I also am working from this point of view as is Suspicio in his quest for verification of the event. If Source A intended to address his presentation in or for spiritual purposes/consideration he would have presented it or framed it so. What I am suggesting is that we all agree to continue speaking the same language here. To switch to a spiritual frame would essentially switch the language and make it difficult for others to participate. Cyrellys
You are appearing to be dimwitted concerning my objections.
You are conflating two (2) agendas.
The ostensible agenda of this thread is the evidence relative to the actual occurrence of a (recent) UN meeting pursuant to ufos.
But then, in addition, you are attempting to insinuate another personal agenda, which, as you and “A” are implying, has the Authority of the United Nations, concerning the nature of the alleged visitation.
It is to this INSINUATION that I will continue to object, herein.
Suspicio, Source A mentioned the Indians haveing an issue on some sort of religious nature. Is it at all possible to check and see if any of them attended the various meetings in the information release? Perhaps we could narrow the field a bit this way?
Unfortunately "A" has not informed us of the specific composition of the delegates, so we don't really have a starting point for identifying particular people as representatives. For example, "A" hints that this was not a meeting of general diplomatic staff, so we can't just go contacting the whole Indian mission to the UN and hope to stumble upon the right person.
By contrast, Lorant named quite a few people as present at the alleged 13-14/02 meeting, which we've started to follow up here.
Re: Source Reveals Secret UFO Meeting at U.N. « Reply #1619 on May 6, 2008, 8:06pm »
Jake wrote:
If you wish to copy/paste them in on a new thread here, that would be welcome.
Hi Jake, hi all,
mission accomplished! There is a new thread under the UN-Meeting thread with the deleted postings from HUGH. But take a look! I still try to find out how to cut sentences.
If someone have a backup of Hugh´s postings 51 - 62 he can put it into the thread.