Open Minds Forum - UN / Source "A" - Discussion & Follow Up II

UFO & UFO's, UFO ALIEN, UFO DISCLOSURE, UFO SERPO, UFO CARET, UFO SEINU, UFO PROJECT-CAMELOT - UFO and Alien -The Open Minds Forum

Open Minds Forum
« UN / Source "A" - Discussion & Follow Up II »

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Feb 9, 2010, 3:39pm

Open Minds Forum :: 'Special Guest' Boards :: Source 'A' Disclosures - with Special Guests Clay and Shawn Pickering. :: UN / Source "A" - Discussion & Follow Up II

« Page 95 of 239 » Jump to page Go

Author

Topic: UN / Source "A" - Discussion & Follow Up II (Read 88,025 times)

georgelobuono
Junior Member

member is offline

in 2001

Joined: Mar 2008
Gender: Male

Posts: 15
Karma: 1

Re: UN / Source "A" - Discussion & Follow Up
« Reply #1410 on Oct 13, 2008, 3:00am »

Open letter to Michael Salla re latest on UN meetings:

Like you I find the UN meeting reports and Source A's account
interesting. Although you find that the reports still need
independent confirmation, if we look at the reports from an If-then
perspective we see some patterns consistent with earlier, unrelated
reports.

For example, the Navy's leading role in sorting out information for
the public is something we've seen previously. I wonder whether a
distinction is made within the Navy between Navy intel and the higher
admiralty. The use of middle-rank officers is a good way to pose a
measure of deniability.

The hostility of Saudi Arabia and some other Islamic countries to
disclosure would be expected. Disclosure would remove a layer of
elite management of religious phenomena that puts off public
perception of Saud family fraud. In some other Islamic nations,
disclosure would stimulate independent critical thinking, on the one
hand, while also posing the possibility of alien use of religious
themes in ways beyond official or clerical control. I wonder whether
Dubai is more liberal in this regard, given their press.

But Germany's reported hostility is a conundrum. I have a brother who
has lived in Germany for about 16 years and he often complains of a
resistance there to new ideas--especially alien-related topics. On
the other hand, a manipulated post-war circumstance bred deep
skepticism in Germany. Add to that German leeriness of US imperial
dundering and you can also see where Germans may also fear a
disclosure scenario that deals too strong a hand to US managment of
the subject.

I wonder why Source A would find India "impossible to deal with." The
East has long acknowledged the existence of aliens and a re-cycling
universe cosmology, hence there are less ideological obstacles. So I
wonder whether India may be seen as TOO willing to open to the
public. India's ability to blend alien appearance with traditional
outlook may cause US and European manipulators to fear loose lips in
India. Disclosure immediately calls into question whether India would
obey and conform to US military-industrial and nuclear agendas. India
may simply say it will manage its relations with aliens as it always
has... Imagine the corporate reaction to that.

And if China wants the US to pay for disclosure, it might not be so
much a financial concern. Instead, it may represent the fact that
China can plainly see that the US has a certain agenda that China
doesn't want to be appended to as though in total agreement. The
Chinese certainly know that a US black budget cabal has a deeper
technological inroad, probably more extensive human-alien contacts of
a technological sort, than does the Chinese government. They may even
fear breeding program infiltration of US elites, i.e. in the "tall
white" and gray case (see the reports of Charles Hall, Corso, Robert
Dean, Lt. Col. Steven Wilson, and Clifford Stone). Of course, as
Naomi Klein writes, now that a Friedmanesque agenda has resulted in
94% of China's billionaires being the children of former top
Communist party officials, believe it or not, China may have black
budget/cabal complications of its own.

Source A's report that the Air Force handled contact with
extraterrestrial life would tail with what Charles Hall and others
say about the tall whites, for example. From the perspective of Col.
Philip Corso's colleagues, we can imagine deep concerns in the Navy
and the Army about the Air Force being compromised (or even
infiltrated?) as a result of those contacts. That would parallel
Corso's old notes about how the Army felt that anything it told the
CIA about aliens or alien technology would soon end up in KGB hands
due to a web of loose-lips and compromises. In this case, the fear
would be that vulnerable information in the Air Force goes straight
to aliens and those dark eyed hybrids in black (rather than men in
black), so to speak. The Air Force role could be one of unbridled
ambition to copy and have control of alien flight technology. Add
stiff doses of alcohol and revolving door ambition (or a lust for
power) and you can see how problems might arise in those reported off-
world "junkets."

The Navy's reported concern about and investigations of "world" and
corporate hostility to disclosure could suggest that the Navy
suspects that there is more to the situation than simple human
reticence. The presence of what David Jacobs refers to as late-
stage/human breeding program operatives (also noted by Robert Dean)
may be a wild card in the equation. The Navy and other informed
observers on this planet are keenly aware of that. Infiltrated
personnae would not be trying to smooth tensions, at the moment--for
obvious reasons.

Some readers may wonder why the Navy would have a discrete policy
interest of long standing. It stems from that fact that, as Corso
wrote, the different services each began programs to investigate and
research downed alien technology (and more) after Roswell, perhaps
earlier. Because the Navy was selected to do the first early Idaho
nuclear reactor research (ostensibly for submarine and carrier use),
the Navy was the obvious early choice to research what was then
suspected to possibly be alien use of nuclear technology--way back
circa 1947. Of course we now know that alien technology is scalar and
beyond, but back in 1947 scientific knowledge wasn't so broadly
based. As a result, the Navy has long had a discrete interest in
aliens and ufo's.

Source A said that the "USAF has handed off to the US Navy
responsibility for a specific contact project involving the
extraterrestrials discussed in the February 12 meeting." That
suggests that the Air Force may be either embarrassed at the depth
and closeness it has allowed tall white and other aliens reportedly
directly based inside the United States, or the Air Force is aware
that the other uniform services may see a possible threat in direct,
sometimes dutiful obedience of Air Force officers in both aiding and
providing for tall white and other alien presence here. The United
States is on particularly weak feet during its current economic
situation, hence the Air Force hand-off to the Navy may represent
tacit admission that the Air Force is far over its head.

In addition, we have to wonder whether the situation is one in which
compromised Air Force officers (and their corporate cohorts) may want
the Navy to get a taste of their interactions with such aliens. The
problem, of course, is that any breeding program operatives or
aligned aliens would quickly try to treat Navy officers to a dribble
of technology and special off-world buddy arrangements. To date, the
Navy has been the most independent of the services, hence this late-
stage conspicuous contact almost suggests a measure of desperation on
the given aliens' part. Which aliens, we must ask?

Human-alien contacts have proceeded so far and to such explicit
extent (even in my own case) that this last Navy-alien case seems
very, very late in the entire process. The Navy probably knows much
more than we see on the surface.

The reported threats to UN diplomats by international corporations
may represent more than mere greed. All nations involved in this
process, i.e. China, can easily see that alien breeding program
operatives are an important human concern, especially when humankind
is proceeding beyond a technological threshold that will allow us to
derive competent scalar and inter-stellar flight and communications
technology independent of the most visible of current alien
interventions. So it is very late in the day, in that regard, hence
we see two competing factions in the reported UN meetings: pro-
disclosure vs. a narrow corporate and Saudi money elite.

The fact that some in the military clearly want the public to know
about and peer into the competing, partly compromised factions in the
UN meetings story (if we look at it from an if-then perspective)
shows that we aren't alone in perceiving stark dangers in those who
are trying to thwart competent public knowledge of this process. It's
a question not only of diclosure, but WHAT KIND of disclosure is in
the offing. As US imperial influence wanes and other nations begin to
see the potential for a less filtered, less murderous/corporate kind
of public awareness, we should expect to see potentially dangerous
moves by the compromised parties.

--George LoBuono Davis, CA